2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11332-022-00896-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability and accuracy of body fat estimates using skinfolds and DXA in elite Gaelic football players: a validation study and development of novel prediction equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prevalence of LEA in the present study is less than previously reported in elite male GF players (65–70%) [ 1 ]. However, the current study calculated LBM using the newly validated Dunne method of assessing FM in elite male GF players [ 38 ]. It is worth noting that the mean sum of 7 skinfolds in both the current study and McGuire et al [ 1 ] are the same for PRE and IN (65 mm).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Prevalence of LEA in the present study is less than previously reported in elite male GF players (65–70%) [ 1 ]. However, the current study calculated LBM using the newly validated Dunne method of assessing FM in elite male GF players [ 38 ]. It is worth noting that the mean sum of 7 skinfolds in both the current study and McGuire et al [ 1 ] are the same for PRE and IN (65 mm).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, caution should be taken when choosing what predictive equations to use. Dunne et al [ 38 ] evaluated the accuracy and variability of various predictive equations in estimating BF% and FM of male elite GF players in comparison to DXA [ 38 ]. Findings indicated that previous skinfold prediction equations commonly used to estimate BF% and FM in GF players all underestimated BF% and absolute FM [ 38 ], meaning previous estimations of EA in this population may have been overestimated, due to the overestimation of LBM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations