Variabilité de la répartition du tissu musculaire du membre postérieur de l'agneau. — I. Muscles individuels

Anous, M. R.

doi:10.1051/rnd:19860604

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 18 publications

(8 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Another part could result equally from the existing differences in muscle distribution (Anous, 1986). Another part could result equally from the existing differences in muscle distribution (Anous, 1986).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Relationship between muscle and bone development of the hind limb in lambs of different breeds

Anous¹

1989

Anim. Prod.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A total of 52 ram lambs of different morphological types slaughtered at a comparable stage of body development (carcass weights = 19-5 (s.d. 3-10) kg) were used to study the variation in the relationship between muscle and bone development in the hind limb using multivariate techniques. Development of individual muscles was expressed relative to the weight of the major bone to which they are closest, considered here as their carrier bone.Variability of muscle : bone ratios of individual muscles varied considerably from one muscle to another. The coefficient of variation (CV) ranging from 0-111 to 0-462 (average CV = 0-199). Relative to the same bone, the variability of muscle : bone ratios for each of the three anatomical regions of the hind limb was still important. This suggests that variability may be due to other factors besides muscle weight, such as bone shape.The correlation between the various muscle : bone ratios was low in some cases. However, a significant association existed between muscle : bone ratios of individual muscles and the total muscle : bone ratio in the hind limb which indicated that some muscle : bone ratios can be used as indicators of muscling in the selection of meat animals such as m. semimembranosus/femm, m. gluteobiceps/femur, m. adductores•/'femur and m. semitendinosus/femur.The most discriminant variables of the population in multivariate analysis were m. soleus/tibia, m. extensor digitorium lateralis/tibia, m. quadmtus femoris/coxal, m. gemelli/coxal and m. vastus medialisl femur. It was also possible to distinguish the different morphological types of the different breeds by the values of the ratios between these variables.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%