2000
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-204x2000001100012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variabilidade fenotípica em genótipos de acerola

Abstract: RESUMO -As medidas de variabilidade fenotípica, correlações, efeitos diretos e indiretos na aceroleira (Malpighia emarginata DC.) da região de Itápolis, SP, objetivaram direcionar o processo seletivo de genótipos. Os parâmetros comprimento e largura média de folhas, altura de planta, diâmetro de copa, peso médio de fruto, peso médio de polpa/fruto, peso médio de 20 frutos e peso médio de polpa por 20 frutos mostraram diferenças quanto a genótipos e épocas. Em acidez, tamanho e largura média de fruto, as difere… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
5
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The range from 38.58% (Acer-11) to 61.21% (Acer-13) is close to the 47.8-58.9% range presented by Gomes et al [2] and the 40.83-65.63% obtained by Semensato and Pereira [12]; lower than the 59-75% range shown by Aróstequi and Pennock [15] and higher than the 30% average reported by Lopes et al [1]. However, the Acer-13, Acer-16, Acer-15, Acer-12 and Acer-8 genotypes did not significantly differ from each other.…”
Section: Physical Characterssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The range from 38.58% (Acer-11) to 61.21% (Acer-13) is close to the 47.8-58.9% range presented by Gomes et al [2] and the 40.83-65.63% obtained by Semensato and Pereira [12]; lower than the 59-75% range shown by Aróstequi and Pennock [15] and higher than the 30% average reported by Lopes et al [1]. However, the Acer-13, Acer-16, Acer-15, Acer-12 and Acer-8 genotypes did not significantly differ from each other.…”
Section: Physical Characterssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Breeding studies for acerola improvement have as an objective to obtain plants that produce fruits with uniform chemical and physical attributes, including high levels of vitamin C, which can provision the market with fresh fruit and frozen pulp [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Path analysis of the main dependent variable (carotenoid content) and independent variables, in 28 peach cultivars and two nectarine cultivars, with decomposition of phenotypic correlations into components of direct (main diagonal in bold) and indirect (off-diagonal) effects used in oxidative reactions, which are activated by cellular stresses experienced by the membranes during this period, contributing to the reduction in the ascorbic acid content. Nunes et al (2004), working with red mombin, found that the variable TA was the main determinant of the ascorbic acid content, which is opposed to reports by Gomes et al (2000), who recommended the selection based on SS for gains in vitamin C in acerola.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Acidity levels have been mentioned among different genotypes ranging from 0.96 to 1.97 g of malic acid 100 g -1 of pulp and pH from 2.9 to 3.5 (MACIEL et al, 2010) while Musser et al (2004) reported values ranging from 0.8 to 1.6 g of malic acid 100 g -1 of pulp and 3.2 to 3.4 for titratable acidity and pH respectively. This difference, according to Gomes et al (2000) may be explained as genotype and environment factors. Means followed by the same letter in the column do not differ by Tukey test at 5% significance level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%