2008
DOI: 10.18637/jss.v027.i04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

VAR, SVAR and SVEC Models: Implementation WithinRPackagevars

Abstract: The structure of the package vars and its implementation of vector autoregressive, structural vector autoregressive and structural vector error correction models are explained in this paper. In addition to the three cornerstone functions VAR(), SVAR() and SVEC() for estimating such models, functions for diagnostic testing, estimation of a restricted models, prediction, causality analysis, impulse response analysis and forecast error variance decomposition are provided too. It is further possible to convert vec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
190
0
9

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 364 publications
(199 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
190
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…We set the lag order p equal to 2 after evaluating different VAR(p) models using Akaike's information criteria (Pfaff 2008a). For each VAR(2) model, we then tested the ability of each harvest variable (CPUE HZ1 and CPUE HZ2 ) to predict the other.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We set the lag order p equal to 2 after evaluating different VAR(p) models using Akaike's information criteria (Pfaff 2008a). For each VAR(2) model, we then tested the ability of each harvest variable (CPUE HZ1 and CPUE HZ2 ) to predict the other.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if there is co-integration between the two variables, the resulting system will be stationary and as a result the test statistics will be asymptotically valid (Engle and Granger, 1987). I tested public support and legislative output for co-integration and the p-value of 0.037 provided by the Phillips-Ouliaris co-integration test (Pfaff, 2008) shows that the null hypothesis of no co-integration can be refuted. The implication of co-integration is that the series are drifting together at roughly the same rate (Greene, 2003: 650).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pertain to the category of trend stationarity, because these variables are usually undergoing systematic change over the course of therapy. The VARMAX procedure implemented in SAS® version 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., 2011) provides a simple option (trend=linear) for VAR-analyses of data that contain linear trends, and the same applies to the package vars (Pfaff, 2008;Pfaff & Stigler, 2013) (Tables W4 & W5). Besides the assumption of stationarity, time-series analysis requires that data were assessed at fixed intervals (equally spaced data).…”
Section: Running Head: Time Series Panel Analysis 13mentioning
confidence: 99%