1984
DOI: 10.1179/cmq.1984.23.3.309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vapour Pressure Equations for the Metallic Elements: 298–2500K

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
216
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 672 publications
(247 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
10
216
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the chemical potential of Na gas is only slightly higher than l Na employed in this study, by as little as 0.81 eV per atom, an order of magnitude smaller than that for Co gas (9.43 eV), which can be easily overcome if the entropy term is taken into account. In fact, the vapor pressure of Na is many orders of magnitude higher than that of Co: 1.5 9 10 À6 atm and 5.1 9 10 À2 atm for 300 K and 700 K, 54 respectively. This implies that Na is easily vaporized, producing Na vacancies in Na x CoO 2 with a small energy penalty.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, the chemical potential of Na gas is only slightly higher than l Na employed in this study, by as little as 0.81 eV per atom, an order of magnitude smaller than that for Co gas (9.43 eV), which can be easily overcome if the entropy term is taken into account. In fact, the vapor pressure of Na is many orders of magnitude higher than that of Co: 1.5 9 10 À6 atm and 5.1 9 10 À2 atm for 300 K and 700 K, 54 respectively. This implies that Na is easily vaporized, producing Na vacancies in Na x CoO 2 with a small energy penalty.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Conversely, the Fish and Lielmezs equation is better: the values obtained (7500 K to 8900 K) belong to the range of high values and are in good accord with previous determinations. Alcock et al [29] indicate that the most precise set in Table 2 is the third one; therefore, the value of 7504 K has to be particularly considered. The first set is less precise, but the value derived for T c is very close to the previous one.…”
Section: Constants Of Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peaks were characterized by the CuMnO 2 phase with a monoclinic structure in the C2/m space group [23]. Considering that the sintering temperature (1353 K) was near the melting point of Mn 2 O 3 (1353 K) and that the vapor pressure of Mn is higher than that of Cu [27], Mn 2 O 3 evaporated easily and the Cu/Mn ratio became nonstoichiometric. …”
Section: Phase Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%