2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2017.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vapour permeation for ethanol recovery from fermentation off–gas

Abstract: In ethanol fermentations, about 2% of the ethanol leaves the fermenter with the offgas. Conventionally, this is recovered by absorption in water. As alternative, vapour permeation was investigated conceptually for ethanol recovery from fermentation off-gas. A preliminary techno-economic evaluation of this system using hydrophobic membrane was carried out. The results were compared with conventional absorption. For the assumed membrane, concentrated ethanol (~ 66 mass%) might be achieved using vapour permeation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The steam required by the phase transition on fermentation broth reduces the energy efficiency. Gaykawad et al [30] proposed a flowsheet for ethanol recovery from liquid fermentation off-gas by VP using hydrophobic membrane. Technoeconomic evaluation indicated that the cost of VP process was higher than conventional absorption process because the profit of off-gas recovery was limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The steam required by the phase transition on fermentation broth reduces the energy efficiency. Gaykawad et al [30] proposed a flowsheet for ethanol recovery from liquid fermentation off-gas by VP using hydrophobic membrane. Technoeconomic evaluation indicated that the cost of VP process was higher than conventional absorption process because the profit of off-gas recovery was limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite being efficient, recovery using vapour permeation remains expensive, due to the costs associated with membranes and vacuum. [ 17 ] Absorption seems to be the most attractive option for large‐scale use because the equipment is usually simple to install and operate. [ 18 ] In Brazil, some distilleries have used scrubbers to wash the gas leaving the fermenters, in order to avoid losses of ethanol carried by the CO 2 produced during the fermentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%