2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2020.106180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vapour-liquid equilibrium data for the carbon dioxide (CO2) + carbon monoxide (CO) system

Abstract: In carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS), a thorough understanding of thermophysical behaviour of the candidate fluid is an essential requirement for accurate design and optimised operation of the processes. In this communication, vapour liquid equilibrium data (VLE) of the binary mixtures of CO+CO2 are presented. A static-analytic method was used to obtain VLE data at six isotherms (253.15, 261.45, 273.00, 283.05, 293.05, 298.15) K and pressures up to 12 MPa. The standard uncertainties of the measure… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is generally good consistency in the trends for isotherms obtained from different publications. Some of the data sets obtained by different authors at the same temperatures match with each other very well [e.g., the measurements by Coquelet et al and Løvseth et al for Ar (Figure d), by Souza et al Westman et al, and Chapoy et al for CO, except for a small number of outliers in Westman et al’s data at 253.152 and 298.166 K (Figure e,f), and by Pteropoulou et al and Xu et al for CH 4 at 293 K (Figure h)]. The low dilution limit is particularly well resolved for H 2 (Figure b) and also for N 2 and Ar (Figure a,d, respectively).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…There is generally good consistency in the trends for isotherms obtained from different publications. Some of the data sets obtained by different authors at the same temperatures match with each other very well [e.g., the measurements by Coquelet et al and Løvseth et al for Ar (Figure d), by Souza et al Westman et al, and Chapoy et al for CO, except for a small number of outliers in Westman et al’s data at 253.152 and 298.166 K (Figure e,f), and by Pteropoulou et al and Xu et al for CH 4 at 293 K (Figure h)]. The low dilution limit is particularly well resolved for H 2 (Figure b) and also for N 2 and Ar (Figure a,d, respectively).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The relative standard uncertainty of the fugacity coefficient u (ϕ V∞ )/ϕ V∞ was calculated based on eq . The uncertainties u ( y )/ y and u ( x )/ x were either taken from the experimental studies ,, or estimated as a ratio of the reported absolute experimental uncertainties divided by the smallest measured mole fraction. The uncertainty u ( x ) by Wei et al was estimated to be 0.0005 based on the data reported to four significant figures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations