The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1983
DOI: 10.1063/1.444836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vapor pressures and lattice energies of oxalic acid, mesotartaric acid, phloroglucinol, myoinositol, and their hydrates

Abstract: In the present investigation, we report the enthalpy of dehydration and the enthalpy of sublimation of a number of organic hydrates and their anhydrous counterparts. These values are used to test the transferability of a set of atom–atom potential parameters, originally derived for carboxylic acids. The calculations showed that the parameter set was transferable to a fairly good degree.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hypothesis can be tested by comparing p •, L (T ) and p •,S (T ) from different measurement techniques. Measurements of p •,S for all compounds studied here are available, including direct measurement by KEMS (Booth et al, 2010), extrapolation from T ≈ 340 K using Knudsen mass-loss effusion (Ribeiro da Silva et al, 2000;Ribeiro da Silva et al, 2001), and extrapolation from 411 K < T < 440 K using a simultaneous torsion and mass-loss effusion technique (de Wit et al, 1983). These measurements are summarized in Table 4 and graphically depicted in Fig.…”
Section: Comparison To Solid-state Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hypothesis can be tested by comparing p •, L (T ) and p •,S (T ) from different measurement techniques. Measurements of p •,S for all compounds studied here are available, including direct measurement by KEMS (Booth et al, 2010), extrapolation from T ≈ 340 K using Knudsen mass-loss effusion (Ribeiro da Silva et al, 2000;Ribeiro da Silva et al, 2001), and extrapolation from 411 K < T < 440 K using a simultaneous torsion and mass-loss effusion technique (de Wit et al, 1983). These measurements are summarized in Table 4 and graphically depicted in Fig.…”
Section: Comparison To Solid-state Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, such a large hole would result in too high a pressure in the ionization region of the KEMS, which would result in a risk of the ioniser burning out. The data shown in Table 4 is the average of 3 independent runs using literature (de Wit et al, 1982) values for oxalic acid as the calibration compound with either the Faraday Cup detector or the SEM detector, and 1 run which used our malonic acid values as the calibration with the SEM detector. The reported errors are the standard deviation over 4 runs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The X23 database contains two polymorphs of oxalic acid, for which the experimental energy difference between the α and β forms amounts to only 0.05 kcal/mol. 240,253,279 Yet, current vdW-inclusive first-principle approaches yield energy differences between about −1 and 1 kcal/mol. PBE+MBD has an absolute error in the difference of only 0.12 kcal/mol but predicts the wrong ordering, 7 whereas PBE0+MBD correctly predicts the ordering with an absolute error of 0.22 kcal/mol, illustrating how subtle the differences in the two polymorphs are.…”
Section: Benchmark Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%