2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jced.9b00745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vapor Pressure of Aqueous HCOOK Solution as Working Fluids of an Absorption Heat Transformer at High Temperature

Abstract: Aqueous potassium formate solution is regarded as a potential working fluid of an absorption heat transformer (AHT) because of its noncorrosive and biodegradable characteristics. The vapor pressure of working fluids is an important property for application in an absorption cycle. However, current experimental data are mostly limited to temperature and concentration ranges that are suitable for a dehumidification system. Thus, more accurate data of vapor pressure are anticipated. In this paper, the equilibrium … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in ref , the AARD for vapor pressures of water and NaCl solution were 0.72 and 0.74%, respectively. The maximal RD for vapor pressures of water and NaCl solution were −1.38 and 1.78%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in ref , the AARD for vapor pressures of water and NaCl solution were 0.72 and 0.74%, respectively. The maximal RD for vapor pressures of water and NaCl solution were −1.38 and 1.78%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The validation of the apparatus was conducted in our previous work in which the relative deviation (RD) and average absolute relative deviation (AARD) were chosen to evaluate the accuracy of data for validation purpose: …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to verify the properties results for HCOOK/H 2 O, results obtained by ASPEN PLUS has been compared with experimental data presented by Shaozhi et al, 45 and Pallavi et al as shown in Figure 4. A similar trend of properties results can be seen in both plots with experimental data but there is an average of 4.7% and a maximum 10.44% error with respect to Shaozhi et al 45 It can be seen that there is more deviation in ASPEN results at lower temperature as compared to higher temperature. While in comparison to the experimental data presented by Pallavi et al, 46 ASPEN results were found to be in good agreement with an average of 4.9% error and a maximum of 5.57% error.…”
Section: Process Modelling Of Oahp System Using Aspen Plusmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In order to verify the properties results for HCOOK/H 2 O, results obtained by ASPEN PLUS has been compared with experimental data presented by Shaozhi et al., 45 and Pallavi et al. as shown in Figure 4.…”
Section: Modelling Approachesmentioning
confidence: 94%