2017
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1700247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vapor pressure deficit predicts epiphyte abundance across an elevational gradient in a tropical montane region

Abstract: By measuring this proxy of canopy VPD, TMCF researchers will better understand differences in microclimate and plant community composition across TMCF sites. Incorporating such information in comparative studies will allow for more meaningful comparisons across TMCFs and will further conservation and management efforts in this ecosystem.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
36
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
4
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Canopy soil, meteorological and canopy hydrologic data are rarely collected together, but one ongoing study in the tropical montane cloud forest (TMCF) region in Monteverde, Costa Rica, is collecting such data. Researchers have established six canopy sites along an elevation gradient spanning from 1100 m on the Pacific side of the mountain range, which is a premontane rain forest, to 1600 m on the Atlantic side of the range, which is an exceedingly wet and relatively aseasonal cloud forest site [71]. We present, as an example, an analysis of the frequency of canopy soil dryness at multiple elevations for Monteverde's forest canopy ( Figure 6)-a site that represents conditions where the canopy saturation state is expected to be consistently saturated.…”
Section: Canopy Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Canopy soil, meteorological and canopy hydrologic data are rarely collected together, but one ongoing study in the tropical montane cloud forest (TMCF) region in Monteverde, Costa Rica, is collecting such data. Researchers have established six canopy sites along an elevation gradient spanning from 1100 m on the Pacific side of the mountain range, which is a premontane rain forest, to 1600 m on the Atlantic side of the range, which is an exceedingly wet and relatively aseasonal cloud forest site [71]. We present, as an example, an analysis of the frequency of canopy soil dryness at multiple elevations for Monteverde's forest canopy ( Figure 6)-a site that represents conditions where the canopy saturation state is expected to be consistently saturated.…”
Section: Canopy Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uppermost site (1550 m asl) is in cloud forest, the mid-elevation (1400 m asl) site is just below the average current cloud base and the lowest site (1100 m) is in premontane rain forest. Further site details have been published previously [71], but each of these sites host canopy soils. Available canopy soil water storage varied with elevation, but a large portion of the maximum soil moisture content was often available to precipitation (and occult deposition) throughout the study period and many small rain events did not fill canopy soils to capacity ( Figure 6).…”
Section: Canopy Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The global average environmental lapse rate of 6.5°C/km (Thayyen & Dimri, ) applied to the rugged mountains underlying some tropical forests indicates that steep gradients in temperature and relative humidity occur over relatively short horizontal distances. These changes in microclimate with elevation appear to be strong drivers of variation in vascular epiphyte biomass and species richness (Bussmann, ; Ding et al, ; Gehrig‐Downie, Marquardt, Obregón, Bendix, & Gradstein, ; Gotsch, Davidson, Murray, Duarte, & Draguljić, ; Hietz & Hietz‐Seifert, ; Wolf & Flamenco‐S, ), and may explain the mid‐elevation peak in vascular epiphyte species richness that has been documented in montane forests (Cardelús, Colwell, & Watkins, ; Hietz & Hietz‐Seifert, ; Krömer, Kessler, Gradstein, & Acebey, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such changes will likely cause physiological stress in epiphyte communities that could influence patterns of biomass and diversity (Darby, Draguljić, Glunk, & Gotsch, ; Pounds, Fogden, & Campbell, ; Still et al, ). For example, epiphytes exposed to experimental drought and warming experienced declines in leaf thickness, stomatal conductance, and sap flow (Darby et al, ), and the absorption of cloud water directly through the leaf surfaces of some species suggests that cloud immersion may be important for maintaining adequate hydration (Darby et al, ; Gotsch et al, , ). Understanding epiphyte patterns across multiple spatial scales can indicate at which scales taxa may be most vulnerable to changes in climate and landscape.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%