2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-35740-4_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vanishing Point Detection by Segment Clustering on the Projective Space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to the number of detected VPs, these algorithms aim at estimating three estimate three orthogonal VPs, 4,5 or any present nonorthogonal VP. 3,6,7 Based on their estimation strategy, line classification algorithms are roughly divided into two categories; algorithms that specify accumulator spaces and those that perform the clustering directly on the image plane.…”
Section: Vanishing Point Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With regard to the number of detected VPs, these algorithms aim at estimating three estimate three orthogonal VPs, 4,5 or any present nonorthogonal VP. 3,6,7 Based on their estimation strategy, line classification algorithms are roughly divided into two categories; algorithms that specify accumulator spaces and those that perform the clustering directly on the image plane.…”
Section: Vanishing Point Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latter category, the workspace is the actual image plane. 6,9 Line clustering is generally decided by computations, such as the distances among points and lines. Typical computational methods are random sample consensus (RANSAC) and its variants (such as multi-RANSAC and J-Linkage).…”
Section: Vanishing Point Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number n is an overestimation of the number of trials needed to obtain a certain number of "good" models [13,31,37]. Then, we compute the CS of each model hypothesis using Equation (4). Let U be the set of all these consensus sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. n} do 3 Select at random a minimal sample set (MSS) X mms(j) of size b from X ; 4 Estimate θ j from X mms(j) by solving (∀x ∈ X mms(j) ) f µ (x; θ) = 0; 5 U ← {C µ (X , θ j , δ)} n j=1 , see Equation (4); algorithm that introduced this framework, detects a single model by taking the CS from U with the largest size, and uses it to estimate θ from C as in Equation (5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, these techniques typically introduce computationally expensive algorithms or they suffer robustness. Although vanishing points and their roles in plane detection of two-dimensional (2-D)/3-D color images have been indicated in the literature, 17,18 it is almost impossible to utilize them for depth images due to the following reasons. First of all, it is required to cover a relatively large area in an image to detect vanishing points, which is not the case for depth images targeted in this paper (e.g., urban scenes versus the Kinect indoor depth images).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%