1991
DOI: 10.2307/439965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vanishing Marginals in State Legislative Elections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The general election vote share is likely to be less in multimember legislative districts (Cox and Morgenstern 1995;Niemi, Jackman, and Winksy 1991;Weber, Tucker, and Brace 1991). Thus, an indicator variable distinguishing between single-member districts (coded "1") and multi-member districts (coded "0") is included.…”
Section: Independent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The general election vote share is likely to be less in multimember legislative districts (Cox and Morgenstern 1995;Niemi, Jackman, and Winksy 1991;Weber, Tucker, and Brace 1991). Thus, an indicator variable distinguishing between single-member districts (coded "1") and multi-member districts (coded "0") is included.…”
Section: Independent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The level of legislative professionalization has been demonstrated to have an effect on state legislative electoral outcomes (Berry, Berkman, and Schneiderman 2000;Carey, Niemi, and Powell 2000;Holbrook and Tidmarch 1991;Van Dunk and Weber 1997;Weber, Tucker, and Brace 1991). For this variable, the individual legislative salary is used as a measure of professionalism (the higher the salary, the more professional the legislature) and the data are coded in 1000s of dollars.…”
Section: Independent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study found that in 2004, 43 percent of the winning candidates faced either no competition from a major party or won by at least 40 percentage points (Abramowitz, Alexander, &Gunning, 2006). This finding at the congressional level is echoed by "vanishing marginals" in state elections, which shows that the incumbency advantage is an entrenched element in all levels of American politics (Weber, Tucker, &Brace, 1991). One understudied element of the incumbency advantage is that states and state parties impose legal barriers to candidate entry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By favoring incumbents, being more willing to assist secure candidates, and showing no partisan or ideological preferences, state PACs and the parent organizations they represent were clearly seeking to protect themselves in the upcoming legislative sessions. This strategy may be "primitive" and prevent a maxi mum return for the PAC's investment, as Jones and Borris (1985, 97) sug gest, but it also gives due recognition to the absence of competition for state legislative seats, as trends point to increased incumbency advantage and the disappearance of marginal districts (Garand 1991;Weber et al 1991). …”
Section: Campaign Financementioning
confidence: 99%