2002
DOI: 10.1149/1.1425791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vanadium Oxide-Carbon Nanotube Composite Electrodes for Use in Secondary Lithium Batteries

Abstract: Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)Office of Naval Research 800 North Quincy Street Arlington, VA 22217 PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBERTechnical Report #17 SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S) SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
132
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 250 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
132
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, even for V 2 O 5 xerogel, the same challenges of low electrical conduction (both intraparticle, within a V 2 O 5 particle, and interparticle, between V 2 O 5 particles), slow lithium diffusion and structure stability/reversibility still remain. Efforts have been made to improve the conductivity by coating the V 2 O 5 xerogel with conductive materials (that is, single-wall carbon nanotubes) 17 , doping metals 18 and organic polymers [19][20][21][22][23] . These measures can improve the V 2 O 5 xerogel only to a certain degree, and none of them significantly improve the structural stability and reversibility.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even for V 2 O 5 xerogel, the same challenges of low electrical conduction (both intraparticle, within a V 2 O 5 particle, and interparticle, between V 2 O 5 particles), slow lithium diffusion and structure stability/reversibility still remain. Efforts have been made to improve the conductivity by coating the V 2 O 5 xerogel with conductive materials (that is, single-wall carbon nanotubes) 17 , doping metals 18 and organic polymers [19][20][21][22][23] . These measures can improve the V 2 O 5 xerogel only to a certain degree, and none of them significantly improve the structural stability and reversibility.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One is composed of nanofibers of vanadium pentoxide and a conducting polymer, polyaniline 78 while the other uses single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) to electrically "wire" the poorly conducting V 2 O 5 nanoparticles. 86 It is notable that the V 2 O 5 /SWNT composite has shown much better performance than that obtained with poly(aniline), both in terms of specific capacity as in capacity retention. From the TEM images (Figure 4), it is possible to note that the V 2 O 5 /SWNT nanocomposite possesses high pore volume that ensures electrolyte access throughout the electrode, while in the V 2 O 5 /PANI composite a more compact structure is observed.…”
Section: Vanadium Oxidesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Well-defined reduction (cathodic) and oxidation (anodic) peaks occur at 2.4 V (lithiation) and 2.8 V (delithiation) respectively, for the V2O5 nanorings/nanobets. The reversible chemical intercalation and deintercalation reaction [36,37] can be described as…”
Section: Electrochemical Performance Of V 2 O 5 Nanorings/nanoribbonsmentioning
confidence: 99%