2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.119247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vanadate reducing bacteria and archaea may use different mechanisms to reduce vanadate in vanadium contaminated riverine ecosystems as revealed by the combination of DNA-SIP and metagenomic-binning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Iron-reducing bacteria are important members of Hg-methylating communities in natural environments (Bravo et al, 2018;Leclerc et al, 2021) and one common bacterium used to study mechanisms of MeHg formation in laboratory settings is Geobacter sulfurreducens (Kerin et al, 2006;Schaefer and Morel, 2009;Schaefer et al, 2014;Lin et al, 2015;Si et al, 2015;Qian et al, 2016;Thomas et al, 2020). Geobacter species generally play an important role in the biogeochemistry of many environments due to their capacity to grow on abundant minerals containing iron or manganese, and interact with other trace metals such as uranium or vanadium (Cologgi et al, 2014;Yan et al, 2022). The use of G. sulfurreducens enables relatively good control of Hg speciation and its availability for cellular uptake, because it is incapable of sulfate reduction, thus, minimizing the formation of sulfides during the assay (Schaefer and Morel, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iron-reducing bacteria are important members of Hg-methylating communities in natural environments (Bravo et al, 2018;Leclerc et al, 2021) and one common bacterium used to study mechanisms of MeHg formation in laboratory settings is Geobacter sulfurreducens (Kerin et al, 2006;Schaefer and Morel, 2009;Schaefer et al, 2014;Lin et al, 2015;Si et al, 2015;Qian et al, 2016;Thomas et al, 2020). Geobacter species generally play an important role in the biogeochemistry of many environments due to their capacity to grow on abundant minerals containing iron or manganese, and interact with other trace metals such as uranium or vanadium (Cologgi et al, 2014;Yan et al, 2022). The use of G. sulfurreducens enables relatively good control of Hg speciation and its availability for cellular uptake, because it is incapable of sulfate reduction, thus, minimizing the formation of sulfides during the assay (Schaefer and Morel, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LCF results for V K -edge data of the 1.5-week deployed V-bearing Lpc gel (Table , Figure ) show that V was reduced from V V to V IV in areas that correspond to the ferruginous zone of the sediment, indicating that V was likely reduced by the access of porewater Fe 2+ . There are, however, also reports of vanadate reduction to V IV by bacteria and archaea, , which we cannot ruled out as occurring here. The biotic V reduction is further discussed in Section .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…In general, V reduction occurred in the reducing zones of the sediment and increased with increasing sediment depth with the lowest average V oxidation state of +3.79 (21% V III at a depth of ∼15 cm, based on LCF fits: Table and Figure ). The increasing reduction of V with sediment depth is consistent with the redox potential tending to decrease with sediment depth and V reduction driven by both dissolved ferrous iron and hydrogen sulfide. ,,,, We cannot, however, exclude the potential role of microbial V reduction. Based on the calculated Gibbs free energy of V V reduction to V IV (Section S4) compared to Fe III and SO 4 2– reduction, it may be energetically favorable for bacteria to couple V reduction with organic C mineralization. However, the calculated Gibbs free energy of reactions under standard conditions may drastically vary from in situ energies, and therefore, the microbial influence of V reduction in natural marine sediments requires further investigation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5,9,10 Nitrate reductase (Nap) and nitrite reductase (NIR) have been reported to contribute to the reduction process of pentavalent vanadium during denitrification, implying that nitrate and pentavalent vanadium may compete for electrons in the same electron pool. [26][27][28] The removal performance of nitrate in the reactor with and without V(V) was compared. In the process of nitrate-N removal, sodium acetate showed a superior performance, where 100 mg N per L nitrate was degraded to less than 1.5 mg N per L within 12 hours, followed by ethanol and glucose, and the nitrate concentration of 100 mg N per L was degraded to less than 1.5 mg N per L at the 24th hour of the reaction.…”
Section: Variation Of Nitrate and By-products And V(v)mentioning
confidence: 99%