van Hiele Level of Geometric Thinking among Secondary School Students

,; Naufal*, Muhammad Ammar; Abdullah, Abdul Halim; ,; Osman, Sharifah; ,; Abu, Mohd Salleh; ,; Ihsan, Hisyam; ,

doi:10.35940/ijrte.f7541.038620

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Several other studies used descriptive, z-test, and ANOVA. Weighted van Hiele geometric thinking test scores, which [1] introduced in analyzing the data from the van Hiele geometric thinking test he developed, were used in nine articles [9,11,25,26,30,33,[47][48][49]. In addition, the articles tend to use parametric statistics compared to non-parametric statistics to see the extent to which students' geometric thinking levels were.…”

Section: Data Analysis Techniquesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is believed and proven by various studies that there is a relationship between pupils' geometric achievement and their level of geometric thinking [1,[3][4][5][6][7]. According to previous studies, Indonesian pupils' geometric thinking levels still need to improve [8][9][10][11]. Thus, it is vital to pay attention to the fundamentals of geometry, especially geometric thinking, in the early years of education and to ensure that they are taught well [12].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Trend of Geometric Thinking Studies: A Systematic Review

Naufal,

Abdullah,

Zainal

et al. 2024

ITM Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study focuses on reviewing information from several articles published in educational and social sciences journals worldwide to document the trend of geometric thinking studies in the Indonesian context. The current study shows that the number of publications on geometric thinking has increased in the last four years. The studies conducted in Indonesia and for Indonesian students used a systematic review guided by PRISMA to examine a hundred articles indexed by Scopus, Google Scholar, and Science and Technology Index (SINTA) between 2011 and 2021. Van Hiele’s Geometric Thinking Test, developed by Usiskin, is extensively used when examining geometric thinking levels in the intervention. In addition, descriptive analysis and a t-test are also employed. The result shows that the most common type of geometric thinking experimental research is quasi-experimental design, with the qualitative approach found to be the most used. Therefore, educators should increase the quantity of qualitative and quantitative studies from various nations about geometric thinking. Furthermore, it is also essential to examine the correlation between student performance in geometry and the teacher’s level of geometric thinking. Finally, combining the van Hiele Geometry test with interviews is strongly advised to provide comprehensive and in-depth data for examining geometric thinking.

show abstract

Section: Data Analysis Techniquesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Trend of Geometric Thinking Studies: A Systematic Review

Naufal,

Abdullah,

Zainal

et al. 2024

ITM Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Research conducted by Naufal et al (2020) found that 46.6% of junior high school students still have difficulty understanding geometry. This is in line with research conducted by Ali & Ni'mah (2023) which states that students' geometric abilities are low.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Junior High School Students’ Geometry Ability Based on Van Hiele Level’s Thinking

Putri,

Subanji,

Santi Irawati

2024

INOMATIKA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The ability to solve problems and logical thinking of students can be grown by studying Geometry. However, the reality in the field and some research in Indonesia shows that the geometric thinking ability of junior high school students is still relatively low. This study aims to examine the geometric thinking ability of junior high school students according to Van Hiele Theory. This research is a qualitative study with a descriptive approach, which was conducted in one of the junior high schools in Pringsewu Regency involving 28 students of class VIII. One student was selected to represent levels 1, 2, 3, and 4 Van Hiele as the research subject. Data collection was carried out using multiple choice tests and interviews. Data analysis techniques were conducted with data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing stages. The data originality technique was carried out by triangulation, in which the researcher compared the test data with the results of student interviews. The results showed that level 1 students (28.57%) could recognize and name geometric shapes visually; level 2 students (14.28%) could study geometric shapes by observing and mentioning the properties of the shapes; level 3 students (7.14%) could make connections between various geometric shapes and detect general properties of certain geometry; level 4 students (3.57%) could distinguish and make simple conclusions about the shapes and properties of shapes. Kata kunci: berpikir geometri, level van hiele, siswa SMP.

show abstract

“…Construction problems require students to visualize and manipulate geometric shapes mentally. Some students may struggle with spatial visualization, making it challenging for them to envision the steps needed to construct a figure (Naufal et al, 2020). The van Hiele level of geometric thinking indicated that the students at secondary level are in 'formal deduction' level -3.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Learning Difficulties of Ethnic Minority Students for Construction in Geometry

Sapkota

2023

Res. J.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper reports the findings of a study that explored the learning difficulties of ethnic students for construction in geometry and analyzed the views and experiences of the students in practicing construction of geometrical figures like triangle and parallelogram with comparing the area of quadrilateral. This study was based on phenomenological research design on exploring the views and experiences of four ethnic minority students. Unstructured interview was used as the main tool for deriving the data from the participants. The collected data were analyzed and interpreted using thematic approach. The results indicated that the students felt conceptual complexity for the learning of geometry. It was found that students had such difficulties due to their irregularity in the geometry classes, teacher’s biasness to the below average students, shyness to ask questions to the teachers and emphasis on culturally privileged students over the minority group of students. Moreover, the ethnic minority students have their own problems as they miss their classes because of socio-economic status of their family and they are confined to their household works. Thus, the study implies that the conceptual complexity and socio-cultural reflection in classroom should be addressed in teaching geometry to the ethnic minority students.

show abstract

van Hiele Level of Geometric Thinking among Secondary School Students

Cited by 4 publications

References 13 publications

The Trend of Geometric Thinking Studies: A Systematic Review

The Trend of Geometric Thinking Studies: A Systematic Review

Junior High School Students’ Geometry Ability Based on Van Hiele Level’s Thinking

Learning Difficulties of Ethnic Minority Students for Construction in Geometry

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About