1984
DOI: 10.1002/pssb.2221230102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Van der Waals Potentials in Ionic Crystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the exponential factors are different in different pair interactions, whereas in the Born-Mayer potential a common value of hardness parameters has been taken for the cation-anion, cation-cation, and anion-anion interactions. This is not justified for the reasons discussed by Shanker and Agrawal [11]. If one takes unequal values of hardness parameters for the crystal, then the number of parameters becomes too large to be determined from the input data for the lattice parameter and bulk modulus.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, the exponential factors are different in different pair interactions, whereas in the Born-Mayer potential a common value of hardness parameters has been taken for the cation-anion, cation-cation, and anion-anion interactions. This is not justified for the reasons discussed by Shanker and Agrawal [11]. If one takes unequal values of hardness parameters for the crystal, then the number of parameters becomes too large to be determined from the input data for the lattice parameter and bulk modulus.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second and third terms are van der Waals (vdW) dipole-dipole and dipole-quadrupole energies. The constants C and D are related to the dipole-dipole (c ij ) and dipole-quadrupole (d ij ) interaction coefficients as follows [11]:…”
Section: Theory and Methods Of Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second possible source of the disagreement is due to the above-mentioned assumption of proportionality between the repulsion parameter B and the first coordination number v. In fact, this parameter is proportional to the lattice sum S n = y]7 vij/k ~, where kij = Rij/R o (R o is the shortest interatomic distance), which is a function of n and usually somewhat greater than v (e.g. Shanker & Agrawal, 1984). Thus, for the NaC1 structure type v=6, but $6 =6.5952 and S 8 = 6.1457, for the CsCI and CaF 2 structure types v = 8, but S 6 = 8.7088 and S 8 = 8.1575, for the ZnS structure type v = 4, but S 6 = 4.3544 and S 8 = 4.0787 etc.…”
Section: Independence Of the Main Expressions Of The Bvm From The Bonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not consistent with the fact that in most of the ionic crystals anion-anion interactions are much stronger than the cation-cation interactions. On the other hand, the overlap repulsive potential form derived analyt- Another important point is regarding the van der Waals potentials which depend sensitively on the electronic polarizabilities of chalcogenide ions [7]. The polarizabilities of chalcogenide ions are significantly larger [8] than the corresponding values for halide ions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%