“…The presence of C, N, O, Zr, Ni, and Ru in MNRC was confirmed at first (Figure i), then peaks at 852.08/872.2 eV and 855.28/873.4 eV in the Ni 2p spectrum corresponded to Ni 0 and Ni 2+ , respectively, representing the presence of metallic Ni and Ni(OH) 2 (Figure g), and peaks located at 279.8/284.2 eV and 280.2/286.0/288.7 eV in the Ru 3d spectrum represented metallic Ru and RuOx (Figure k), demonstrating that a large number of defects and metal oxides were generated by multiple redox reactions during the synthetic process and eventually led to the formation of multilayer heterogeneous interfaces. − Inspiritingly, these formed interfaces created favorable conditions for improving interfacial effects. In addition, MNRC exhibited the stronger vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) coercivity than MNC due to compositional and microstructural differences in the local magnified view (Figure l), facilitating the higher anisotropy and then promoting the natural resonance enhancement. − Moreover, the elongated shape of MNRC’s VSM also enhanced the permeability value of the sample and improved magnetic loss performance (Figure S6), further determining the MA performance. In the end, the solubility of MNR and MNRC was compared after being left in H 2 O, PBS, and RPMI-1640 for 24 h (Figure S7), and most of the MNR had already precipitated to the bottom after 6 h, while there was no significant sediment in the MNRC group, fully demonstrating that the COF coating could significantly improve its biocompatibility and laying a foundation for its biological application.…”