2017
DOI: 10.1038/am.2017.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Van der Waals epitaxy between the highly lattice mismatched Cu-doped FeSe and Bi2Te3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(30 reference statements)
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the Bi 2 Te 3 film, these mesh scans are shown in Figs. 4a- It is interesting to note that the Bi 2 Te 3 film is indeed relaxed, as expected in van der Waals epitaxy [22], while the Bi 2 Te 2.6 film is perfectely matched to the substrate. The actual shift of hybrid peaks due to film relaxation is estimated from Eqs.…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…For the Bi 2 Te 3 film, these mesh scans are shown in Figs. 4a- It is interesting to note that the Bi 2 Te 3 film is indeed relaxed, as expected in van der Waals epitaxy [22], while the Bi 2 Te 2.6 film is perfectely matched to the substrate. The actual shift of hybrid peaks due to film relaxation is estimated from Eqs.…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…For samples S60 and S62, these lengths are close to the nominal thickness of 20 nm. But for sample S57, the coherence length is smaller than the nominal thickness of 40 nm, probably indicating to structural defects unaccounted for in the X-ray diffrac- Although vdW epitaxy can take place on substrates with relatively large lateral lattice mismatch [11,[45][46][47], it has been demonstrated in Bi 2 Te 3 (001) films on BaF 2 (111) that even mismatch as small as 0.02% can drastically impact the lateral lattice coherence length, or the lateral size of crystalline domains [12]. In MnBi 2 Te 4 (001) films on BaF 2 (111) the lattice mismatch |∆a/a| = |a A −a s |/a S is much bigger, of about 1.1%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[21] One of the challenges for monolithic device integration of TIs is their weak bonding to most substrates, originating from the van der Waals (vdW)-type interaction between film and substrate. While vdW bonding (inherent to the layered nature of the (Sb,Bi)2(Se,Te)3 TI family) can be exploited for overcoming the lattice mismatch in TI-based heterostructures, [22] the weak bonding between TI film and substrate can significantly increase the density of domain boundaries [16] and the formation of rotational twins. As expected, twin formation can be suppressed by growing on perfectly lattice-matched substrates like the insulating BaF2(111).…”
Section: Takedownmentioning
confidence: 99%