Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3239060.3241680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

¡Vamos!

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The risk of death at each road crossing is rather small (1 in 300 million) 6 , and thus it is difficult for any study to claim it fully addresses the potential danger. We acknowledge that our participant sample size and demographic distribution may limit generalizability of our findings (prior work identified location-based differences in road crossing behaviour [8]).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The risk of death at each road crossing is rather small (1 in 300 million) 6 , and thus it is difficult for any study to claim it fully addresses the potential danger. We acknowledge that our participant sample size and demographic distribution may limit generalizability of our findings (prior work identified location-based differences in road crossing behaviour [8]).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Context also plays a role in crossing behaviour. Currano et al [8] highlight the effect of location: pedestrians in a large city are more likely to cross in front of oncoming vehicles than in a smaller city. The impact of other pedestrians has also been studied [14,27].…”
Section: Communication Between Vehicles and Pedestriansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over recent years, there have been several high-profile studies which have utilised a Wizard-of-Oz (WoZ) approach to simulate an AV [13][14][15]. In these on-road studies, the so-called 'Ghost Driver' [13] is typically concealed within a bespoke seat-suit thereby ensuring they cannot be seen by pedestrians and other road users if they make a cursory glance.…”
Section: Ghost Drivermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9]. On-screen guidance should furthermore be scalable and work in urban traffic scenarios, given that a majority of pedestrian-related accidents happen in urban areas [73] and pedestrians tend to be less patient in bigger cities [14]. We created several design sketches and evaluated them in a focus group with four human-computer interaction experts (all male, 25 to 32 years, mean: 29.25 years, SD: 2.98).…”
Section: Prototype Designmentioning
confidence: 99%