2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00383-012-3249-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valved shunt as a treatment for obstructive uropathy: does pressure make a difference?

Abstract: Low-pressure shunts preserved both bladder volume and renal development. High-pressure shunts did neither.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There has not been an innovation in shunt design in several years. There is concern that the shunt itself may cause bladder wall thickening and fibrosis [34]. Kitagawa et al explored the option of a "valved" shunt, hypothesizing it would preserve the filling/emptying cycle of a normal bladder [35].…”
Section: Current Technology and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has not been an innovation in shunt design in several years. There is concern that the shunt itself may cause bladder wall thickening and fibrosis [34]. Kitagawa et al explored the option of a "valved" shunt, hypothesizing it would preserve the filling/emptying cycle of a normal bladder [35].…”
Section: Current Technology and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%