2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valuing water level changes in reservoirs using two stated preference approaches: An exploration of validity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar approach is also used, for instance, by Prayaga et al (2010) on valuing recreational fishing at the Great Barrier Reef (Australia), by Morgan and Huth (2011) on the value of cave diving in Florida, and by Hanley et al (2003) on the benefits of costal water quality improvements. The surveys on which these studies are based include verbal descriptions of the environmental quality change while Lienhoop and Ansmann (2011) additionally present pictures to visualize the changes of the appearance of the landscape owing to different water levels. They also use count data estimation with the actual and contingent behaviour pooled into one data set.…”
Section: A Brief Overview Of Empirical Studies On Contingent Behavioumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar approach is also used, for instance, by Prayaga et al (2010) on valuing recreational fishing at the Great Barrier Reef (Australia), by Morgan and Huth (2011) on the value of cave diving in Florida, and by Hanley et al (2003) on the benefits of costal water quality improvements. The surveys on which these studies are based include verbal descriptions of the environmental quality change while Lienhoop and Ansmann (2011) additionally present pictures to visualize the changes of the appearance of the landscape owing to different water levels. They also use count data estimation with the actual and contingent behaviour pooled into one data set.…”
Section: A Brief Overview Of Empirical Studies On Contingent Behavioumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scenarios depicting the environmental quality changes are most often included in the econometric estimations as dummy variables; the forecast trip frequency and the coefficients of the estimations are then used to compute the effects on welfare (consumer surplus) as a consequence if these scenarios become actual fact. The study by Lienhoop and Ansmann (2011) additionally includes a willingnessto-pay (WTP) question with regard to changing water levels.…”
Section: A Brief Overview Of Empirical Studies On Contingent Behavioumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This combination of revealed and stated preference techniques has been made fruitful by a number of scholars (e.g., [7,8]). On the other hand, willingness-to-pay (WTP) to prevent deterioration or to enhance the quality of landscapes has widely been ascertained by means of visual representations (e.g., [5,6]). …”
Section: Valuing Landscapes By Visual Presentationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the practical implementation of economic valuation methods is often limited to presenting respondents with several scenarios described verbally and by means of pictures of different Alpine landscapes. In some studies (e.g., [5,6]), a picture is manipulated to show different stages of development. Nowadays, new techniques are available to present respondents with such developments, for instance, stereoscopic (3D) presentations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The different scenarios were described verbally, and by means of manipulated pictures to highlight the impacts of different management scenarios on the appearance of the underwater seascape (cf. for the design and use of such scenarios [28][29][30]). The model is estimated as a count data model assuming a standard negative binomial distribution (see Equation (1)).…”
Section: Testable Hypotheses and The Empirical Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%