2013
DOI: 10.1080/14748460.2013.799809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valuing the talk of young people: are we nearly there yet?

Abstract: This paper examines the reasons why young people's talk about themselves and their educational experiences do not seem to be valued in public discourse about education. Drawing on a national dataset of student focus groups, it illustrates how students talk about themselves in educational contexts in a way that is entirely different and more complex than how they are conceptualised by an adult audience and symbolic elites. It demonstrates, contrary to dominant adult perceptions, the critical, communicative and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This pilot study makes several potential contributions. Students often face a lack of recognition for who they are and researchers need to give them a voice (O'Boyle, 2013) which this study has attempted to do, albeit on a small scale. Actively listening to what students say about their educational experiences in this way has potentially improving and empowering effects such as an increase in self-worth, self-respect and learning as well as a greater sense of agency (O'Boyle, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This pilot study makes several potential contributions. Students often face a lack of recognition for who they are and researchers need to give them a voice (O'Boyle, 2013) which this study has attempted to do, albeit on a small scale. Actively listening to what students say about their educational experiences in this way has potentially improving and empowering effects such as an increase in self-worth, self-respect and learning as well as a greater sense of agency (O'Boyle, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the pupil-voice discourse, it is argued that young people have a democratic right to be heard on matters they consider important, and not just as a means of raising levels of achievement. Critics argue that ways of engaging them as important ‘influencers’ of policy, decision-making and change in schools need to be considered (Department for Education, 2004; Ferguson et al., 2011; Fielding, 2007; Guajardo et al., 2006; Klein, 2003; MacBeath, 2006; O’Boyle, 2013; Rudduck et al., 1996; Tetler and Baltzer, 2011). The reality, on the other hand, is that student voice has become ‘politicised’ and ‘incorporated into managerial rhetoric’ (Wisby, 2011: 37), and is often channelled to maintain a power relationship in which privilege is assigned to the adult’s, rather than to the student’s, authentic voice (Cruddas, 2007; Hall, 2017; Stern, 2007, 2013; Thomson and Gunter, 2006).…”
Section: An Alternative ‘Bottom-up’ Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are varied arguments as to why student voice should be heard and considered in education. These arguments include issues of children's rights (Rudduck & Flutter 2000), student empowerment and political agency (O'Boyle, 2013;Rudduck, 2002), the value of the student perspective in education evaluation and improvement (Cook-Sather, 2002;Gough, 1999;McIntyre, Pedder, & Rudduck, 2005), educational benefits for students (Busher, 2012;Rudduck, 2002), and student voice as a transformative agent (Beattie, 2012). Hart (2008) describes an international program that strives for active participation in community-based social action and struggles for legitimacy within the educational system.…”
Section: Meaningful Student Involvementmentioning
confidence: 99%