2002
DOI: 10.1093/eurrag/29.3.289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valuing the outputs of multifunctional agriculture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
88
0
13

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
88
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Between 1997 and2002, the number of farms in San Miguel County, the study area, decreased by 28%, while acres of farmed land decreased by 18% (NASS 2002a). Land use patterns in Alcalde, NM, show a 553% increase in residential use between1962 and 2003, and a decrease in many crops, with orchard crop area decreasing by 69%, for example, and only pasture area increasing, by 47% (Ortiz et al, 2007).…”
Section: Background On Acequiasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Between 1997 and2002, the number of farms in San Miguel County, the study area, decreased by 28%, while acres of farmed land decreased by 18% (NASS 2002a). Land use patterns in Alcalde, NM, show a 553% increase in residential use between1962 and 2003, and a decrease in many crops, with orchard crop area decreasing by 69%, for example, and only pasture area increasing, by 47% (Ortiz et al, 2007).…”
Section: Background On Acequiasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agricultural land provides a variety of ecosystem services, such as open space (Kline & Wichelns, 1994, 1996a, 1996bAdelaja et al, 2006;Adelaja & Lake, 2007;Plantinga & Miller., 2001), wildlife habitat (Nickerson & Lynch 2001), and groundwater recharge (Smith 2006;Fernald et al, 2007;Fernald & Guldan, 2006). This constellation of amenities is also addressed in the agriculture multifunctionality literature (Drake, 1992;Randall, 2002: Rønningen et al, 2004Groenfeldt, 2005). Table 1 displays results from valuation work on agriculture and some other cultural ecosystem services.…”
Section: Values Of Agricultural Ecosystem Services and Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a key issue in the debate on multifunctionality, which inevitably involves differences in perception and values associated to the rural landscape (Hodge, 1991;Mahé, 2001). On the consumers' side, it clearly involves an empirical question of environmental valuation (Randall, 2002;Lee, Paarlberg and Bredahl, 2005), while the principle issue on the production side of multifunctionality concerns the nature and degree of jointness in production, which requires that the multiple outputs be considered simultaneously (OECD, 2001;Vatn, 2002). These issues are most usefully integrated in the formal framework of an optimal allocation model with competing uses of land and other production factors.…”
Section: Formalising the Debate -A Model Of Optimal Land Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors have examined the effects of price policies on the production of non-traded outputs (Randall, 2002, Peterson et al, 2002, Romstad, 2004a, the implications of joint production of traded and non-traded outputs (Paarlberg et al, 2002, Havlik et al, 2005 and the possibilities of valuing agriculture's externalities (Boody et al, 2005). The valuation of multifunctional aspects of agriculture, on continent scale, has been highlighted by Randall (2002). Stated preference techniques, such as Contingent Valuation (CV) and Choice Experiments (CE), have been employed in order to attach monetary values to non-traded outputs of agriculture (Yrjola andKola, 2004, Kallas et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%