2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2006.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valuing spatial accessibility to retailing: A case study of the single family housing market in Hillsboro, Oregon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Key studies of accessibility and its effects have verified that higher accessibility to jobs and land use generates higher housing prices and fewer vehicle miles (Cervero, 2005;Osland & Thorsen, 2008;Srour, Kockelman, & Dunn, 2002). In particular, higher accessibility to retail outlets and universities confers higher premiums on residential property values (Adair, McGreal, Smyth, Cooper, & Ryley, 2000;Franklin & Waddell, 2003;Song & Sohn, 2007). Empirical studies of network centrality have mainly suggested that higher ''Closeness'' and ''Betweenness'' are associated with higher housing prices and rent, population density, and commuting (Barthélemy & Flammini, 2009;Chiaradia, Hillier, Schwander, & Barnes, 2013).…”
Section: Motivation Behind Measuring Spatial Accessibility and Centramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Key studies of accessibility and its effects have verified that higher accessibility to jobs and land use generates higher housing prices and fewer vehicle miles (Cervero, 2005;Osland & Thorsen, 2008;Srour, Kockelman, & Dunn, 2002). In particular, higher accessibility to retail outlets and universities confers higher premiums on residential property values (Adair, McGreal, Smyth, Cooper, & Ryley, 2000;Franklin & Waddell, 2003;Song & Sohn, 2007). Empirical studies of network centrality have mainly suggested that higher ''Closeness'' and ''Betweenness'' are associated with higher housing prices and rent, population density, and commuting (Barthélemy & Flammini, 2009;Chiaradia, Hillier, Schwander, & Barnes, 2013).…”
Section: Motivation Behind Measuring Spatial Accessibility and Centramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study classifies land use into residential, commercial, office, industrial, and other types based on data taken from the Seoul Building Register in 2009 (Brueggeman & Fisher, 2011;Ministry of Land, Infrastructure & Transport, 2014;Song & Sohn, 2007). Residential land use contains single-family and multi-family housing, while commercial land use includes central and neighborhood retail outlets, cultural facilities, hotels and motels, and recreational spaces.…”
Section: Land-use Accessibility and Centralitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both positive and negative spatial externalities result from retail activities in urban areas. At the local scale, retail services provide shopping convenience for, and are a nuisance to, nearby housing markets (Song & Sohn, 2007). Thus, urban scholars and planners face a debate on the impacts of retail externalities on residential welfare.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Munoz-Raskin (2010) examined the positive significance of proximity to bus rapid transit (BRT) networks for property values [51]. There is also a study that shows the significance of spatial accessibility to retail and commercial centers for housing values [52]. As previously noted for community attributes, proximity to urban parks, public open spaces, and education facilities is also critical for increasing prices.…”
Section: Hedonic Price Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%