Valuing rural meanings:The work of the parent supervisors challenging dominant educational discourses

Abstract

This paper explores the idea that rurality is important in children's learning even though it is in conflict with dominant educational discourses. Crucial to identifying this was the use of research methods that focused on rural meanings. In this paper we report on an ethnographic study that explored the experiences of parent supervisors of primary school distance education students. The parent supervisors identified that they chose distance education because it enables them to live their rural lifestyle, which in turn reflects the worldview they aim to bring their children up in. However, the schooling they receive values a different, metropolitan-cosmopolitan worldview (Roberts, 2014). In semi-structured interviews parent supervisors described how they would initially focus on conforming to the expectations of schooling, before then realising this was problematic for their students. They would then instead focus on doing what worked for them, which were actions based on their rural ways of being. Ethnography as an approach enabled this research to focus on rural meanings, which identified that parent supervisors work hard to ensure rural perspectives are included when they teach their children because they know this is necessary to meet their children's learning needs. This leads to an important message for school authorities: rurality does matter in education, and education is not confined to the criteria set by school authorities. Importantly, the situated perspective that is implicit in the actions of parent supervisors indicates that adopting a place-conscious (Gruenewald, 2003) approach to schooling would help to sustain rural lifeworlds.

Building a sense of community belonging: Making mobile families welcome in a rural Australian school

“…Yet research has also indicated that the rural itself is "often associated with negative qualities-with lack and lag, with 'backwardness,' 'inefficiency,' 'lack of progress'" (Donehower, Hogg, & Schell, 2012, p. 4). Such findings indicate the complexities and "complicated histories" of rural locations (Donehower et al, 2012, p. 5; see also Downes & Roberts, 2015;Roberts & Downes, 2016).…”

The spatial implications of academic achievement in Year 12: Rethinking discourses of disadvantage in rural locations

“…Also implicated here are questions of knowledge in curriculum and its relationship to student SES (Young, 2013). Emerging research is extending these perspectives specifically to notions of rural knowledges (Roberts, 2021), forms of knowledge that are ‘…grounded in an understanding of rural life worlds as opposed to meanings rooted in a more metropolitan-cosmopolitan worldview’ (Downes & Roberts, 2015, p. 81). In this context, we argue that knowledge itself is continually produced and reproduced in and through places and spaces, where the rural is seen as a social and cultural phenomenon rather than a generalized and static category (Roberts et al, 2022).…”

Investigating key principles for the design of virtual interactions for children that can support the development of oral language through play

“…It is essential to note that neither this paper nor the promotion of educational technologies for RRR seek to devalue, undermine, or limit the knowledge, perspectives, or lifeworlds of RRR communities. This research centres on the belief that education should take all children beyond their known world and provide broader experiences and opportunities, including those in RRR communities (Downes & Roberts, 2015).…”