Valuing Quality Attributes and Country of Origin in the Korean Beef Market

Abstract

For beef exporters, one of the important questions in the Korean beef market is why Korean consumers are willing to pay almost three times more for domestic Korean beef than they pay for imported beef. To answer this question, we surveyed 1,000 shoppers in Seoul, Korea, and conducted a conjoint analysis on consumers' willingness to pay (WTP) for country equity of domestic vs. imported beef and quality attributes of marbling, freshness, genetically modified organism (GMO)-free feed ingredients and antibiotic-free production. Among all factors contributing to the price differentials, the most important factor seems to be the country of origin followed by the use of GMO feeds and antibiotics in beef production, marbling grade and freshness. This study finds that Korean consumers value origins of imported beef approximately $14/lb less than the Korean origin. Korean consumers' valuation of beef quality and country of origin differs by some demographic groups: older vs. younger generations, homemakers vs. non-homemakers and consumers who prefer to purchase packaged beef vs. consumers who prefer to purchase butcher shop beef. Our empirical findings suggest that the top priority for beef exporters who wish to increase sales and value of their beef in the Korean market must be to counter Korean consumers' strong ethnocentrism by improving the value of their country of origin. Copyright (c) 2009 The Authors. Journal compilation (c) 2009 The Agricultural Economics Society.

Country of origin labeling for complex supply chains: the case for labeling the location of different supply chain links

“…Our results for single‐country products also contribute to a larger body of work that finds that domestic consumers participating in choice experiments have a higher WTP for domestic versus foreign sourced food products (e.g., Chung et al., ; Ehmke et al., ; Gao and Schroeder, ; Loureiro and Umberger, , ; Umberger et al., ; Verlegh and Steenkamp, ). We note that studies relying upon store purchase data for products that undergo COOL changes during the time of data collection reveal that COOL has little effect on consumer demand (e.g., Kuchler et al., for shrimp; Taylor and Tonsor, for beef, pork, chicken, and turkey).…”

Chinese consumers’ preferences and willingness to pay for traceable food quality and safety attributes: The case of pork

“…This conclusion has been repeatedly confirmed by researchers. For example, Chung et al (2009) demonstrated that region of origin is the most important factor that affects consumers' choice and purchase of beef. Alfnes et al (2004) and Lim et al (2013) found that the preferences and WTP of consumers are significantly higher for domestic steaks than for imported steaks.…”

Organic consumers’ preferences and willingness‐to‐pay for locally produced animal products

“…Most of these studies dealt with product quality (e.g. Becker, 2000;Bernu es et al, 2003;Xue et al, 2010;Font i Furnols et al, 2011;Hersleth et al, 2012), or GMO feeds in animal production (Roosen et al, 2003;Carlsson et al, 2006;Chung et al, 2009;Komirenko et al, 2010;Pesek et al, 2011;Zanoli et al, 2013). Font i Furnols et al…”