Abstract:Storm surge and sea level rise (SLR) are affecting coastal communities, properties, and ecosystems. While coastal ecosystems, such as wetlands and marshes, have the capacity to reduce the impacts of storm surge and coastal flooding, the increasing rate of SLR can induce the transformation and migration of these natural habitats. In this study, we combined coastal storm surge modeling and economic analysis to evaluate the role of natural habitats in coastal flood protection. We focused on a selected cross-secti… Show more
“…Marsh mitigation of storm ooding has accompanying economic bene ts, reducing ood damage costs by an average of 37% for large storms across the estuaries within our study. Savings from ungrazed and grazed marsh vegetation scaled exponentially with storm intensity, with the relative marsh-driven cost savings considerably higher than the 1-16% savings previously predicted for similar signi cant tropical storms along open coastlines dominated by extensive fringing or back-barrier marshes 41,57,72 . The estimated absolute ood damage savings within estuaries are similar to those previously estimated for hurricane-exposed US coastlines 73,74 , and considerably greater than the value of other saltmarsh services such as carbon storage 75,76 or livestock grazing 77,78 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Despite evidence of both localised and upstream, estuary-scale, dampening of waves and surge in isolation, there remains a lack of knowledge on how these multi-scale processes interact to holistically reduce ood risk and impacts throughout estuaries ( Supplementary Table S1) ( Figure 1). Accordingly, the contributions of saltmarshes to storm ood mitigation may be grossly underestimated and economically undervalued 56,57 .…”
As storm-driven coastal flooding increases under climate change, wetlands such as saltmarshes are held as a nature-based solution. Yet evidence supporting wetlands’ storm protection role in estuaries - where both waves and upstream surge drive coastal flooding - remains scarce. Here we address this gap using numerical hydrodynamic models within eight contextually diverse estuaries, simulating storms of varying intensity and coupling flood predictions to damage valuation. Saltmarshes reduced flooding across all studied estuaries and particularly for the largest – 100-year – storms, for which they mitigated average flood extents by 35% and damages by 37% ($8.4M). Across all storm scenarios, wetlands delivered mean annual damage savings of $2.7M per estuary, exceeding annualised values of better-studied wetland services such as carbon storage. Spatial decomposition of processes revealed flood mitigation arose from both localised wave attenuation and estuary-scale surge attenuation, with the latter process dominating: mean flood reductions were 17% in the sheltered top third of estuaries, compared to 8% near wave-exposed estuary mouths. Saltmarshes therefore play a generalised role in mitigating storm flooding and associated costs in estuaries via multi-scale processes. Ecosystem service modelling must integrate processes operating across scales or risk grossly underestimating the value of nature-based solutions to the growing threat of storm-driven coastal flooding.
“…Marsh mitigation of storm ooding has accompanying economic bene ts, reducing ood damage costs by an average of 37% for large storms across the estuaries within our study. Savings from ungrazed and grazed marsh vegetation scaled exponentially with storm intensity, with the relative marsh-driven cost savings considerably higher than the 1-16% savings previously predicted for similar signi cant tropical storms along open coastlines dominated by extensive fringing or back-barrier marshes 41,57,72 . The estimated absolute ood damage savings within estuaries are similar to those previously estimated for hurricane-exposed US coastlines 73,74 , and considerably greater than the value of other saltmarsh services such as carbon storage 75,76 or livestock grazing 77,78 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Despite evidence of both localised and upstream, estuary-scale, dampening of waves and surge in isolation, there remains a lack of knowledge on how these multi-scale processes interact to holistically reduce ood risk and impacts throughout estuaries ( Supplementary Table S1) ( Figure 1). Accordingly, the contributions of saltmarshes to storm ood mitigation may be grossly underestimated and economically undervalued 56,57 .…”
As storm-driven coastal flooding increases under climate change, wetlands such as saltmarshes are held as a nature-based solution. Yet evidence supporting wetlands’ storm protection role in estuaries - where both waves and upstream surge drive coastal flooding - remains scarce. Here we address this gap using numerical hydrodynamic models within eight contextually diverse estuaries, simulating storms of varying intensity and coupling flood predictions to damage valuation. Saltmarshes reduced flooding across all studied estuaries and particularly for the largest – 100-year – storms, for which they mitigated average flood extents by 35% and damages by 37% ($8.4M). Across all storm scenarios, wetlands delivered mean annual damage savings of $2.7M per estuary, exceeding annualised values of better-studied wetland services such as carbon storage. Spatial decomposition of processes revealed flood mitigation arose from both localised wave attenuation and estuary-scale surge attenuation, with the latter process dominating: mean flood reductions were 17% in the sheltered top third of estuaries, compared to 8% near wave-exposed estuary mouths. Saltmarshes therefore play a generalised role in mitigating storm flooding and associated costs in estuaries via multi-scale processes. Ecosystem service modelling must integrate processes operating across scales or risk grossly underestimating the value of nature-based solutions to the growing threat of storm-driven coastal flooding.
“…For example, Ouyang et al (2018) describe the pivotal role that coastal wetlands play in mitigating the impacts of cyclones and hurricanes, more especially in the context of climate change, and estimate that the economic value of this approaches US$200 billion in China alone. Rezale et al (2020) demonstrate, for coastal wetlands in New Jersey, USA, that the appropriate management and maintenance of salt marsh vegetation can reduce flooding depths in storm events and significantly reduce property damage in the future, a conclusion also reached by, among others, Highfield et al (2018), Vásquez-González et al (2019) and Montgomery et al (2019). Yang et al (2018b) document the substantial trade-offs that must be accounted for when these systems are allowed to deteriorate and that coastal land reclamation-a process that has been rampant in Asia in general and in China in particular (Sengupta et al 2020)-is particularly deleterious.…”
Section: Introduction: the Value Of Coastal And Estuarine Wetlandsmentioning
As the focus of land-sea interactions, estuarine and coastal ecosystems perform numerous vital ecological service functions, although they are highly vulnerable to various kinds of disturbance, both directly and indirectly related to human activity, that have attracted much recent attention. Critical zone science (CZS) has emerged as a valuable conceptual framework that focuses on quantitative interactions between diverse components of the environment and is able to integrate anthropogenic disturbance with a view to predicting future trajectories of change. However, coastal and estuarine environments appear to have been overlooked in CZS and are notably under-represented, indeed not explicitly represented at all, in the global network of critical zone observatories (CZOs). Even in the wider network of environmental observatories globally, estuarine and coastal wetland ecosystems are only very rarely an explicit focus. Further strengthening of integrated research in coastal and estuarine environments is required, more especially given the threats these ecosystems face due to growing population at the coast and against the background of climate change and sea level rise. The establishment of one or more CZOs, or their functional equivalents, with a strong focus on estuarine and coastal wetlands, should be urgently attended to.
“…More recently, some valuation studies of the protective value of estuarine and coastal ecosystems (ECEs) have developed the expected damage function approach as an alternative to the replacement cost method (Barbier, 2007;Barbier and Enchelmeyer, 2014;World Bank, 2016;Beck et al, 2018;Highfield et al, 2018;Menéndez et al, 2020;Rezaie et al, 2020). This method assumes that an ECE provides a nonmarketed service, such as "protection" of economic activity, property and even human lives, which benefits individuals through limiting damages.…”
The rapid loss of estuarine and coastal ecosystems (ECEs) in recent years has raised concerns over their role in protecting coastal communities from storms that damage property, cause deaths, and inflict injuries. This paper reviews valuation studies of the protective service of ECEs in terms of reducing flood damages. Although the number of studies have grown significantly, there is still a need for a greater range of studies in more locations and for a wider variety of ecosystems. This review also examines, from an economic perspective, the issues and challenges surrounding estimating the protective benefits of ECEs, as exemplified by some of the recent valuation studies. Recent developments in valuation methods are summarized and critically reviewed. Important challenges remain in valuing coastal ecosystems as a defense against flood damages. The review discusses two of them, such as how protective benefits are subject to spatial variability and dependent on connectivity across “seascapes.” These challenges, along with analyzing the multiple benefits of estuarine and coastal ecosystems, are important areas of future research priority.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.