2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.07.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valuing individual animals through tourism: Science or speculation?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the scientific ambiguity and the many assumptions needed to value individual animals, we have refrained from ascribing a tourist value to the whale sharks in Maldives (Catlin et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Because of the scientific ambiguity and the many assumptions needed to value individual animals, we have refrained from ascribing a tourist value to the whale sharks in Maldives (Catlin et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tourism revenue can be considered a type of non-consumptive direct use value (Catlin et al, 2013; for a description of value types see Turner et al, 2003). The value of a natural location or a non-consumptive activity can be evaluated from a non-market perspective by using contingent (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Leisure studies, and the social sciences more broadly, is strongly anthropocentric, positioning humans as the only legitimate focus for study, and concentrating on human priorities, experiences and practices (Dashper, 2018;Finkel & Danby, 2018). If nonhumans do appear in research, they are usually confined to a background role, reduced to species-level, and only considered if their actions or behaviours affect human outcomes (Catlin, Hughes, Jones, Jones, & Campbell, 2013). Within this work, individual animals and their unique subjectivities disappear from view, and their 'animalness' is presented only in relation to their value to humans.…”
Section: More-than-human and Multispecies Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Se ha observado que puede estar sucediendo que el autoconsumo ambiental induce a ciertos propietarios a aceptar remuneraciones del capital cinegético manufacturado por debajo de las normales del mercado e incluso negativas, justificadas estas últimas por ver cumplidas los propietarios sus "ilusiones venatorias", es decir, las pérdidas cinegética que reflejan sus márgenes de explotación negativos no serían tales, sino que podría ser una producción de servicio intermedio de la actividad cinegética omitido a favor de la actividad de autoconsumo ambiental. Las especies cinegéticas también podrían estar incorporando renta ambiental pública embebida en el valor de las rentas ambientales de los productos públicos del ecosistema, con mayor influencia en el servicio recreativo público (CATLIN et al, 2013).…”
Section: Productos Cinegéticosunclassified