2021
DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valuing high‐seas ecosystem conservation

Abstract: The high seas provide a variety of ecosystem services that benefit society. There have, however, been few attempts to quantify the human welfare impacts of changes to the delivery of these benefits. We assessed the values of several key ecosystem service benefits derived from protecting ecosystems in the high seas of the Flemish Cap through choice experiments conducted in Canada, Norway, and Scotland. Rather than solely eliciting public willingness to pay, we also explored the determinants of variance in the e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The survey of public preferences towards protecting high-sea ecosystems on the Flemish Cap was designed based on previous surveys of public preferences for protecting national deep-sea ecosystems conducted in Norway and Scotland ( Ankamah-Yeboah et al, 2021 ). The survey design followed best practice guidelines ( Johnston et al, 2017 ) and is further described in Xuan et al (2021) who present results using the original 2019 dataset. 2…”
Section: Survey Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The survey of public preferences towards protecting high-sea ecosystems on the Flemish Cap was designed based on previous surveys of public preferences for protecting national deep-sea ecosystems conducted in Norway and Scotland ( Ankamah-Yeboah et al, 2021 ). The survey design followed best practice guidelines ( Johnston et al, 2017 ) and is further described in Xuan et al (2021) who present results using the original 2019 dataset. 2…”
Section: Survey Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…then followYao et al (2014) andXuan et al (2021) and employ a two-stage approach to explain our WTP estimates in terms of respondent socio-economic characteristics. This entailed estimation of several ordinary least squares (OLS) models with individual attribute WTP estimates being the dependent variable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%