Valuing Ecological Improvements in the Chesapeake Bay and the Importance of Ancillary Benefits

Abstract

Reducing the excess nutrient and sediment pollution that is damaging habitat and diminishing recreational experiences in coastal estuaries requires actions by people and communities that are within the boundaries of the watershed but may be far from the resource itself, thus complicating efforts to understand tradeoffs associated with pollution control measures. Such is the case with the Chesapeake Bay, one of the most iconic water resources in the United States. All seven states containing part of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed were required under the Clean Water Act to submit detailed plans to achieve nutrient and sediment pollution reductions. The implementation plans provide information on the location and type of management practices making it possible to project not only water quality improvements in the Chesapeake Bay but also improvements in freshwater lakes throughout the watershed, which provide important ancillary benefits to people bearing the cost of reducing pollution to the Bay but unlikely to benefit directly. This paper reports the results of a benefits study that links the forecasted water quality improvements to ecological endpoints and administers a stated preference survey to estimate use and nonuse value for aesthetic and ecological improvements in the Chesapeake Bay and watershed lakes. Our results show that ancillary benefits and nonuse values account for a substantial proportion of total willingness to pay and would have a significant impact on the net benefits of pollution reduction programs.

Property Values, Water Quality, and Benefit Transfer: A Nationwide Meta-analysis

“…26 One would not necessarily want to add estimates across these methods due to potential double counting. Although a large portion of total values derived by stated preference studies may reflect nonuse values (e.g., Freeman et al 2014;Moore et al 2018), there is still likely overlap in the endpoints valued. For example, both could capture use values from waterfront recreation affected by water quality.…”

Actual Versus Hypothetical WTA Stated Values for Recreational Fishing Licenses: Experimental Evidence of Fish Tales

“…In hindsight, we may have been able to better assess the extent of potential strategic responses by including a follow-up question that asked respondents to state their reasons for accepting [rejecting] the offer amount. Debriefing questions that explore the nature of respondents' decision-making process have proved to be informative for identifying strategic behavior from stated preference WTP dichotomous choice responses (see Vossler, Doyon, and Rondeau 2012;Moore et al 2018).…”

What the past suggests about future development of ecosystem service values applicable to USDA agricultural program evaluations

“…Future derivations of ESVs will need the same (or similar to the) two-step process: distribute a national value to regions and generate the ESVs from the regional values. For example, Moore et al (2017) derived estimates of household and total willingness to pay for changes in water clarity and number of bass, crab, and oysters in the Chesapeake Bay, based on models of reductions in sediment, nutrients, and phosphorus. The models did not differentiate effects based on where pollutants entered the Bay-e.g., pollutants in the northern edge are assumed to have the same impact as pollutants on the southern edge.…”