2020
DOI: 10.1108/meq-10-2019-0210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valuing biodiversity of Dachigam National Park: a choice experiment application

Abstract: PurposeBiodiversity loss has become widespread since current rates are potentially catastrophic for species and habitat integrity, and the Dachigam National Park in Jammu and Kashmir (India) is not a distinctive case. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to elicit the willingness to pay (WTP) for biodiversity conservation of the Park.Design/methodology/approachA survey-based choice experiment method was carried out at the Dachigam National Park, an area that is threatened by several anthropogenic pre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of the costs of diversifying food crops, although we show that at the county level there are likely no revenue losses, ideally one would use farm level data to demonstrate this more confidently. For cost–benefit analysis purposes it would also be useful to place a monetary value on the gains of avian biodiversity found here, possibly through a contingent valuation study along the lines of Bhat et al (2020). Finally, birds only constitute one small part of the local ecosystem and thus further studies for other types of wild or plant life are needed to draw any broader conclusions regarding the potential benefits from diversifying crops on local biodiversity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of the costs of diversifying food crops, although we show that at the county level there are likely no revenue losses, ideally one would use farm level data to demonstrate this more confidently. For cost–benefit analysis purposes it would also be useful to place a monetary value on the gains of avian biodiversity found here, possibly through a contingent valuation study along the lines of Bhat et al (2020). Finally, birds only constitute one small part of the local ecosystem and thus further studies for other types of wild or plant life are needed to draw any broader conclusions regarding the potential benefits from diversifying crops on local biodiversity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies which dealt more generally with the role of recreational features on tourists preferences without focusing on specific activities found similar results. For example, [13] found visitors preferences to be affected by flora and fauna, [16] by biodiversity levels and educational opportunities, and [19] by the presence of ecotourism attractions, such as waterfalls and caves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice experiment (CE) approach has been extensively used worldwide to investigate tourists' preferences and recreational behavior. Examples of CE studies that focused on outdoor recreation in protected areas include [10] at Oulanka National Park in Finland, [11] at Kruger National Park in South Africa, [12] at National Park Hoge Kempen in Belgium, [3] at national and natural parks in Romania, [13] at Peñuelas Lake National Reserve in Chile, [14] at the Black-Faced Spoonbill Reserve and [15] at Shei-Pa National Park, both in Taiwan, [16] at Dachigam National Parkland in India, and [17] at birding and avitourism sites in Australia and the United Kingdom. The existing literature using CE to analyze tourism in protected areas has focused on several aspects of recreational demand, such as preferences for improvements to recreational features [18], ecotourism development [19], and willingness to financially support nature conservation [14] and land management under alternative uses [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study applies a CV approach which is reliably employed in estimating non-marketable or poorly marketed environmental resources (Hanemann, 1994; Mitchell and Carson, 2013; Bhat et al ., 2020; Bhat and Sofi, 2021; Amoah et al ., 2022a, b; Jorgensen, 2023). This technique uses a hypothetical market scenario to obtain bids from individuals indicating their WTP for a resource.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%