Values, Meanings, and Positionalities: The Controversial Valuation of Water in Rio de Janeiro

Abstract

Water is not only a valuable substance, but is also valued in different ways dependent on substantive social, ecological and historical conditions. The concept of water value positionality is introduced to describe the dynamic ensemble of meanings forged from cooperation and competition in the allocation, use and conservation of water. Positionality helps us to understand water conflicts as individuals and groups struggling to legitimise their valuation of water. The explanatory function of positionality is demonstrated with an empirical case study in the metropolitan region of Rio de Janeiro. Hegemonic positionality depicts water as an economic resource required for regional development and urban growth. This has been increasingly challenged by sectors of the state apparatus who call for the monetary valuation of water. Beyond these two perspectives, there exists a vast range of water values articulated by the local communities in their struggle for survival and political affirmation. The conclusion is that, in the process of constantly revaluing water, there are temporary 'positions of value' that last and change with socio-cultural and politico-ecological experiences.

Making sense of environmental values: a typology of concepts

“…The languages and concepts we use to describe and analyze ecosystems and humans have specific historical meanings in particular places, and this comes with political baggage as well as opportunities. For example, in places with high stakes struggles against the enclosure and commodification of natural resources, using monetary valuation can reinforce unequal power relations between communities and economic elites (Ioris 2011).…”

Water scarcity and the exclusionary city: the struggle for water justice in Lima, Peru

“…Although the predominant rationality of state bureaucracies privileges the administrative boundaries of catchments and river basins, the actual territoriality of water is not given or prearranged in advance. The territories of water are actively produced as hydrosocial networks (Boelens et al, 2014) between groups and sectors with different understanding of water values, asymmetric power and often contrasting cultures and technologies (Ioris, 2011). Water territories, such as catchments and hydrological regions, are spatial networks of socionatural phenomena that receive different interpretations and attract contrasting reactions (Zwarteveen & Boelens, 2014).…”

The Value Base of Water Governance: A Multi-Disciplinary Perspective

“…Studying cultural values of landscapes, Stephenson (2008) proposes that these are dynamic interactions between forms (such as the existence of a river), practices (such as fishing) and relationships (such as the aesthetic appreciation of a landscape), encompassing both human and non-human dimensions, as well as their present and history. Many geographers also draw attention to the fact that valuation processes are often highly politicised, i.e., they represent a struggle between different groups of society (Ioris 2011;Upton 2014). 1 This is also one of the central claims of political ecology, which is significantly rooted in human geography.…”