2000
DOI: 10.21236/ada377968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Values, Culture, and Civil-Military Relations: Implications for the Postmodern Military

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Direct physical interpretation of fluctuation measurements is typically difficult. However, the bin-size or scale dependence of fluctuations is determined by the correlation structure of the underlying distribution [9,10]. We have determined that fluctuation scale dependence can be inverted by a numerical procedure to obtain autocorrelation projections which can be interpreted directly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct physical interpretation of fluctuation measurements is typically difficult. However, the bin-size or scale dependence of fluctuations is determined by the correlation structure of the underlying distribution [9,10]. We have determined that fluctuation scale dependence can be inverted by a numerical procedure to obtain autocorrelation projections which can be interpreted directly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local spectrum properties may deviate from the event-averaged p t spectrum differently at each point on (η, φ) and differently in each event [13]. The bin-size (scale) dependence of excess event-wise p t fluctuations measured by variance difference σ 2 p t :n (δη, δφ) reflects the correlation structure of the local p t spectrum properties [14]. Certain aspects of the correlation structure can be accessed when that scale dependence is inverted to obtain p t autocorrelations [12]: those aspects which depend on relative separation of pairs of points but not on absolute position on (η, φ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the world of business. The strength of military culture is explained by the existence of one complex characteristic -"the sense of duty", described in four perspectives (Tinoco and Arnaud, 2013): y a set of values like integrity, subordination, unbending obedience, fervent loyalty, duty, selflessness and strict discipline (Trainor, 2000), y a "set of normative self-understandings", deeply held by personnel members, directing their formulation of professional identity, code of conduct, and social worth (Snider 1999), y an integral and the innermost component of the military culture, containing cultural attributes as honor and commitment to duty, unconditional service and allegiance to the nation, achievement of the greater good to the sacrifice of self, and unqualified authority to those in command (Breslin, 2000;Riccio et al, 2004), and y a set of attitudes and behaviors for personnel members, defining what is considered right, good, and important (Breslin, 2000). Furthermore, Tinoco and Arnaud (2013) outline key nuances of military culture by means of applying the seven dimensions of organizational culture profile (OCP), developed by O'Reilly, y Obligatory unit cohesion and teamwork in the most difficult circumstances (team orientation dimension) y The use of specific machines and equipment requires serious employees' orientation to detail and precision (attention to detail dimension).…”
Section: Exposing Cultural Reverberations In the Defense Businessmentioning
confidence: 99%