2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11856-014-1094-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valued difference fields and NTP2

Abstract: Abstract. We show that the theory of the non-standard Frobenius automorphism, acting on an algebraically closed valued field of equal characteristic 0, is NTP 2 . More generally, in the contractive as well as in the isometric case, we prove that a σ-henselian valued difference field of equicharacteristic 0 is NTP 2 , provided both the residue difference field and the value group (as an ordered difference group) are NTP 2 .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an application of the above result, we show in § that the constructed model Msans-serifLA2 endowed with a natural structure of a (discretely) ordered module has the independence property. This answers negatively the question of Chernikov and Hils [, Question 5.9.1] whether all ordered modules have the NIP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As an application of the above result, we show in § that the constructed model Msans-serifLA2 endowed with a natural structure of a (discretely) ordered module has the independence property. This answers negatively the question of Chernikov and Hils [, Question 5.9.1] whether all ordered modules have the NIP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…A structure scriptA has the NIP (negation of the independence property; cf. for an extensive introduction to NIP structures and theories) if there is no formula φ(x¯,y¯) such that for every nω, there are ai¯A(x¯), with i<n, and bJ¯A(y¯), with Jn, such that φ(ai¯,bJ¯)iJ.Chernikov and Hils [, Question 5.9.1] asked whether all ordered modules have the NIP. We answer their question negatively:…”
Section: A Non‐nip Discretely Ordered Modulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we shall follow the definition given in . (The same notion is called strongly indiscernible array in .) Definition We may view the Cartesian product ω×ω as a model in the language scriptL ar :={<1,<2} where < 1 and < 2 are binary relation symbols interpreted in ω×ω as follows: (a,b)<1(c,d)a<c(a,b)<2(c,d)(a=c)(b<d)Given a set of tuples A:={truea¯μμω×ω} where all a¯μ have the same arity, …”
Section: Tp2 Burden and Indiscernible Arraysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several variations of the notion indiscernible array exist in the literature [2,7,8,15]. In this paper, we shall follow the definition given in [15].…”
Section: Remark 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation