The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value of Ventricular Intracranial Pressure Monitoring for Traumatic Bifrontal Contusions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…TBI has a high incidence in low-income and middle-income countries, as well as developing countries such as Iran and China (3)(4)(5). The incidence of TBI is increasing rapidly due to the significant increase in road traffic collisions, including motor vehicle accidents (5). Although an increasing number of randomized controlled trials including intracranial pressure monitoring, therapeutic hypothermia, surgical methods and drug administration have been performed in recent years and the long-term outcome has substantially improved, a significant benefit is not observed following drug interventions (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TBI has a high incidence in low-income and middle-income countries, as well as developing countries such as Iran and China (3)(4)(5). The incidence of TBI is increasing rapidly due to the significant increase in road traffic collisions, including motor vehicle accidents (5). Although an increasing number of randomized controlled trials including intracranial pressure monitoring, therapeutic hypothermia, surgical methods and drug administration have been performed in recent years and the long-term outcome has substantially improved, a significant benefit is not observed following drug interventions (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After conservative treatment fails to control refractory intracranial hypertension (e.g., ICP >25 mmHg for a long period of time), there is sufficient evidence to support the use of decompression as a life-saving intervention [17]. Rapid decompressive craniectomy can reduce ICP, thus improving cerebrovascular compliance [18], cerebral oxygenation [19,20], and cerebral perfusion [21,22], and can also reduce postoperative brain edema [11], but it also leads to a high probability of rebleeding and brain swelling during surgery or post-operatively. Flint et al reported that 58% of patients (n=40) experienced acute encephalocele and ipsilateral or contralateral rebleeding with rapid decompressive craniectomy [23], which sharply increases ICP and aggravates cytotoxicity and angiogenic brain edema [24,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the epidemiological statistics, the incidence of sTBI is considerably high, which can account for about 10–20% of the total number of surgical traumas, and has a higher wartime incidence 1 , 2 . The increased intracranial pressure (ICP) is one of the main causes of death after sTBI 3 , 4 . The standard decompressive craniotomy is currently the conventional surgery for sTBI in neurosurgery, since it rapidly decreases ICP to minimize brain damage 5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%