Value of synthetic MRI quantitative parameters in preprocedural evaluation for TRUS/MRI fusion‐guided biopsy of the prostate

Abstract

Background Transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fusion‐guided biopsy has a high clinical application value. However, this technique has some limitations, which limit its use in routine clinical practice. Therefore, the selection of suitable proatate lesions for this technique is worthy of our attention. Synthetic MRI (SyMRI) is capable of quantifying multiple relaxation parameters, which might have potential value in preprocedural evaluation for TRUS/MRI fusion‐guided biopsy of the prostate. The aim of our study is to examine the value of SyMRI quantitative parameters in preprocedural evaluation for TRUS/MRI fusion‐guided biopsy of the prostate. Methods We prospectively selected 148 lesions in 137 patients who underwent prostate biopsy in our hospital. Next, 2–4 needles of TRUS/MRI fusion‐guided biopsy combined with 10 needles of system biopsy (SB) were used as the protocol for prostate biopsy. Before biopsy, the MAGiC sequences of the MRI images of the enrolled patients underwent post‐processing, and the longitudinal relaxation time (T1), transverse relaxation time (T2), and proton density (PD) were extracted. The biopsy pathology results were used as a gold standard to compare the differences in SyMRI quantitative parameters between benign and malignant prostate lesions in the peripheral and transitional zones. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to confirm the optimal SyMRI quantitative parameter for prostate lesion benignancy/malignancy performance, and the cutoff values of these parameters were used for grouping the lesions. The single‐needle biopsy prostate cancer (PCa)‐positivity rates (number of positive biopsy needles/total biopsy needles) and PCa overall detection rates by TRUS/MRI fusion‐guided biopsy and SB were compared in different subgroups. Results The T1 and T2 values can determine the benignancy/malignancy of prostate transition lesions(p < 0.01), and the T2 value has a greater diagnostic performance (p = 0.0376). The T2 value can determine the benignancy/malignancy of prostate peripheral lesions. The optimal diagnostic cutoff values for T2 were 77 and 81 ms, respectively. The single‐needle PCa positivity rate of TRUS/MRI fusion‐guided biopsy was higher than SB for any prostate lesions in different subgroups (p < 0.01). However, only in the subgroup of transition zone lesions with T2 ≤ 77 ms, the PCa overall detection rate of TRUS/MRI fusion‐guided biopsy was significantly higher than that of SB (p = 0.031). Conclusion SyMRI‐T2 value can provide a theoretical basis for the selection of suitable lesions for TRUS/MRI fusion‐guided biopsy.