Value of social robots in services: social cognition perspective

Abstract

Purpose The technological revolution in the service sector is radically changing the ways in which and with whom consumers co-create value. This conceptual paper considers social robots in elderly care services and outlines ways in which their human-like affect and cognition influence users’ social perceptions and anticipations of robots’ value co-creation or co-destruction potential. A future research agenda offers relevant, conceptually robust directions for stimulating the advancement of knowledge and understanding in this nascent field. Design/methodology/approach Drawing from service, robotics and social cognition research, this paper develops a conceptual understanding of the value co-creation/destruction potential of social robots in services. Findings Three theoretical propositions construct an iterative framework of users’ evaluations of social robots in services. First, social robots offer users value propositions leveraging affective and cognitive resources. Second, users’ personal values become salient through interactions with social robots’ affective and cognitive resources. Third, users evaluate social robots’ value co-creation/destruction potential according to social cognition dimensions. Originality/value Social robots in services are an emerging topic in service research and hold promising implications for organizations and users. This relevant, conceptually robust framework advances scholarly understanding of their opportunities and pitfalls for realizing value. This study also identifies guidelines for service managers for designing and introducing social robots into complex service environments.

Leveraging service design for healthcare transformation: toward people-centered, integrated, and technology-enabled healthcare systems

“…Building upon service systems thinking (Maglio et al, 2009), service design also seeks to innovate by envisioning new forms of value cocreation within service systems (Wetter-Edman et al, 2014). This holistic and systems view can make a significant contribution to Unraveling the interdependencies between healthcare actors is important for developing new services that improve the wellbeing for the overall network (Anderson et al, 2013;Čaić et al, 2019b). Service design tools, such as actor network maps (Morelli and Tollestrup, 2007) or maps of multiactor activities, interactions, goals, and potential conflicts (Patrício et al, 2018), help in visualizing and understanding the complexity of these value networks.…”

The transformative service paradox: the dilemma of wellbeing trade-offs

“…While service research has investigated the technology enabled social support between people via online communities (Van Oerle et al, 2016) or via call centers (Rafaeli et al, 2008), recent studies focused on technology-embodied communication partners such as robots in frontline interactions (Wirtz et al, 2018), in customer-service operations (Xiao et al, 2019) and in the context of elderly care services ( Cai c et al, 2019). In the social distancing era, social robots might provide regular, everyday social support (Lee et al, 2006).…”

What Makes a Robot Social? A Review of Social Robots from Fiction to a Home or Hospital Near You

“…Social concepts like trust (e.g., [56,57,58,59]), attachment (e.g., [60]), empathy (e.g., [61]), acceptance (e.g., [57,62]), and disclosure (e.g., [42,63,64,65,66,67]) with social robots are being studied. In addition, the use of social robots is growing in complex social contexts such as those found in education (e.g., [58,59,68]), service (e.g., [69]), and care sectors (e.g., [70,71,72]).…”