2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)04401-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value of radiotherapy after radical surgery for esophageal carcinoma: a report of 495 patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
208
4
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(226 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
11
208
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For patients with neck or upper thoracic esophageal carcinoma, radiotherapy is a major treatment method now. Esophageal carcinoma is often accompanied with supraclavicular or superior mediastinal lymph node metastasis, and correlated with poor prognosis (Kawahara et al, 1998;Kurokawa et al, 2003;Xiao et al 2003;Xiao et al, 2005;Tachimori et al, 2011) Research showed that IMRT technique can not only elevate target dose, but possesse advantages of higher target conformity, higher dose uniformity and better protection of sensitive organs compared with conventional conformal radiotherapy (Nutting et al, 2001;Fu et al, 2004;Wu et al, 2004;Chandra et al, 2005;Wang et al, 2006;Fenkell et al, 2008). It was reported 5~7 intensity-modulated beams were more effective in target dose uniformity, target conformity and radiation dose to organs at risk when comparing the effect of IMRT with that of 3D-CRT on 5 cases of upper esophageal carcinoma using simultaneous integrate boost (Fu et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For patients with neck or upper thoracic esophageal carcinoma, radiotherapy is a major treatment method now. Esophageal carcinoma is often accompanied with supraclavicular or superior mediastinal lymph node metastasis, and correlated with poor prognosis (Kawahara et al, 1998;Kurokawa et al, 2003;Xiao et al 2003;Xiao et al, 2005;Tachimori et al, 2011) Research showed that IMRT technique can not only elevate target dose, but possesse advantages of higher target conformity, higher dose uniformity and better protection of sensitive organs compared with conventional conformal radiotherapy (Nutting et al, 2001;Fu et al, 2004;Wu et al, 2004;Chandra et al, 2005;Wang et al, 2006;Fenkell et al, 2008). It was reported 5~7 intensity-modulated beams were more effective in target dose uniformity, target conformity and radiation dose to organs at risk when comparing the effect of IMRT with that of 3D-CRT on 5 cases of upper esophageal carcinoma using simultaneous integrate boost (Fu et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neck or upper thoracic esophageal carcinoma with lymph node metastasis is a common clinical disease with poor prognosis (Kawahara et al, 1998;Kurokawa et al, 2003;Xiao et al 2003;Xiao et al, 2005;Tachimori et al, 2011). Due to hypoxia, metastatic lymph node is difficult to control by radiotherapy with the conventional dose, especially those large metastatic lymph nodes (Watarai et al, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 In spite of comprehensive available treatment, including chemotherapy, surgery and radiotherapy, the overall 5-year survival rate for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), the most common form of esophageal cancer, remains low, at 10-40%, because of advanced disease, metastasis and resistance of the tumor to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. [19][20][21] Cisplatin is the most frequently used chemotherapeutic agent for ESCC. However, given that resistance to cisplatin limits the success of treatment, elucidation of the mechanisms that regulate cisplatin resistance in ESCC is urgently needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although advances in diagnostic methods and health education have contributed to discovery of the disease in its early stages, many cases are still not detected until the advanced stage. Despite the use of modern surgical techniques in conjunction with multitreatment modalities such as radio-and chemotherapy, the overall 5-year survival rate remains 40 -60% (1)(2)(3)(4). In an effort to better understand this disease and predict its clinical outcome, numerous molecular markers for tumor progression and prognosis, e.g., STMY3 (5), interleukin 6 (6), C1orf10 (7), and EC45 (8), and for lymph node metastasis, e.g., caveolin-1 (9), EphA2 (10), FAK (11), cystain B (12), and MMP-12 (13), have been identified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%