2015
DOI: 10.17265/2328-2134/2015.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value of Public Administration Management to International Relations: Scaffolding an Inter-Disciplinary Research Agenda

Abstract: the theory and praxis for both disciplines. However, since then, the study of PAM and IR were separated in substance in what was called the "great divide" in IR, the presumption that domestic and international politics are distinct spheres that are defined by distinct organizing principles. Today, this "great divide" is being challenged with globalization. However, the attempt of looking at the domestic aspects of IR and international aspects of PAM stopped short of a deep inter-disciplinary discourse. Apart f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 75 publications
(78 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Member-states authorize these institutions to address transnational problems and they work with transnational civil servants to achieve common perspectives. Yet the global governance arena has no single executive, legislative, or judicial branch; no separation of powers; and no uniform laws upon which an employee might rely (Phua Chao Rong, 2015). There are neither unified internal nor external whistleblower appeal mechanisms nor commonly accepted whistleblower definitions.…”
Section: Background Literature Descriptive Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Member-states authorize these institutions to address transnational problems and they work with transnational civil servants to achieve common perspectives. Yet the global governance arena has no single executive, legislative, or judicial branch; no separation of powers; and no uniform laws upon which an employee might rely (Phua Chao Rong, 2015). There are neither unified internal nor external whistleblower appeal mechanisms nor commonly accepted whistleblower definitions.…”
Section: Background Literature Descriptive Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%