2019
DOI: 10.1002/we.2398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value of pre‐construction proof loading information for structural design

Abstract: We introduce a new concept that enables a decision analyst to explore and quantify the benefits of decision alternatives that exceed the scope of a pre‐posterior decision or value of information analysis. This new concept, namely, the expected value of sample information and action analysis, facilitates to examine decision alternatives that become only possible with additional knowledge. The concept is introduced by taking basis in proof load testing as a source of (pre‐)posterior knowledge. Pre‐posterior deci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Direct numerical integration [17,18,20] becomes prohibitive for multidimensional problems, so that such evaluations generally require the use of Monte-Carlo techniques [19,34,35], which still represent a significant undertaking when numerical simulations are required to evaluate the performance function. Similarly, Bayesian updating of the probability of failure [11,22] require the probability of the observed load conditional on failure not occurring to be evaluated, again involving repeated evaluation of the performance function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Direct numerical integration [17,18,20] becomes prohibitive for multidimensional problems, so that such evaluations generally require the use of Monte-Carlo techniques [19,34,35], which still represent a significant undertaking when numerical simulations are required to evaluate the performance function. Similarly, Bayesian updating of the probability of failure [11,22] require the probability of the observed load conditional on failure not occurring to be evaluated, again involving repeated evaluation of the performance function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work on updating of structural reliability for existing structures using the lower bound on resistance capacity implied by severe loading or proof load-testing rely on a Bayesian updating formulation, in which the distribution of the structural resistance is truncated at the limit implied by the observed load [17,18]. Updated reliability values are then obtained either by integration of the posterior distribution function [18,19,20,21], or by updating the failure probability using the probability of the implied resistance bound conditional on the structure surviving the loading event [11,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die Verbindung der Berechnung von Versagenswahrscheinlichkeiten und experimentellen Traglastversuchen ist Gegenstand zahlreicher Veröffentlichungen [17, 35, 36, 42–44].…”
Section: Probabilistischen Berechnungenunclassified