1962
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.5296.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value of Nerve-excitability Measurements in Prognosis of Facial Palsy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
2

Year Published

1966
1966
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The most prevalent qualitative tests now available are the nerve excitability test (NET) [3,4,12,13] and the maximum stimulation test (MST) [3,13]. The most common quantitative tests now available are ENOG or EEMG [5,6], FNLT [8,10,11,15,16,18] and electromyography [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most prevalent qualitative tests now available are the nerve excitability test (NET) [3,4,12,13] and the maximum stimulation test (MST) [3,13]. The most common quantitative tests now available are ENOG or EEMG [5,6], FNLT [8,10,11,15,16,18] and electromyography [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patients with biphasic waves throughout the 7 days after onset of paralysis had good outcomes, but those with monophasic or flat waves within 1 week had poor outcomes. According to previous studies [21][22][23][24] , abnormal findings in conventional tests, such as the nerve excitability test and electroneurography, appear more than 7 days after the onset of paralysis. Therefore, we considered that the AFNR was more useful for the early evaluation of nerve degeneration in patients with Bell's palsy than the conventional tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Facial nerve paresis including Bell's palsy and Ramsey‐Hunt syndrome appears suddenly in healthy individuals. Although remission is often focused by conservative treatment (Campbell, Hickey, Nixon, & Richardson, ), in some cases, persists paresis adversely reduced the quality of life. In these cases, the pathological mechanism involves the attenuation of central‐nervous‐system motor‐nerve signals rather than organic damage to the facial nerves or mimetic muscles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%