2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2012.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value of microbiology study in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction

Abstract: Microbiology study can predict tight CNLDO and helps in choosing the most successful treatment option. CNLDO with Staphylococcus infection and Serratia marcescens were likely to have tight NLD obstruction and silastic intubation had better outcomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been a few studies investigating the microbiology in CNLDO, and the bacterial spectrum varies among different age groups and changes over time (Table 3) [8][9][10][11][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Most of the previous literatures included both infants and young children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been a few studies investigating the microbiology in CNLDO, and the bacterial spectrum varies among different age groups and changes over time (Table 3) [8][9][10][11][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Most of the previous literatures included both infants and young children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results are very similar to those reported by Bareja and Ghose and Al-Faky et al . [1415] Brook and Frazier who studied the bacteriological profile of the dacryocystitis patients in the age group 14–81 years, reported S. aureus followed by S. epidermidis as the common causative organisms. [16] The inclusion of causes other than congenital NLDO did not alter our results much from the results of those studies that solely studied the bacteriology of congenital cases of NLDO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literatürde benzer şekilde izole edilen etkenlerin sıklıkla gram-pozitif olduğunu bildiren çok sayıda çalışma mevcuttur. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Bu çalışmaların sonuçları Tablo 2'de özetlenmiştir. Gram-pozitif mikroorganizmalardan S. pneumoniae ve S. aureus; %29.6 ve %11.1 oranları ile en sık izole edilen mikroorganizmalardı.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…[18] Kuchar, Usha ve Al-Faky, çalışmalarında en sık izole edilen iki bakteriyi bizim sonuçlarımızdan farklı olarak Streptococcus pneumoniae ve Haemophilus influenzae olarak bildirmiş-lerdir. [13,19,20] İzole edilen gram-negatif mikroorganizmaların oranı çalışmamızda %14.8 idi. Bu oran Bareja ve Ghose ile Göncü ve ark.nın çalışmalarında bildirdikleri oranlara benzemektedir (sırasıyla %14.3 ve %16.6).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation