2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-015-0408-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating the pancreatic allograft transplant complications

Abstract: Contrast-enhanced MRI is useful for the non-invasive assessment of pancreas transplant complications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an example, Doppler imaging of the mitral annulus can be a sensitive, but not specific technique for detecting severe heart transplant rejection . Newer MRI technologies that allow for diffusion weighted imaging can noninvasively evaluate tissue viability and acute kidney transplant rejection and postpancreatic transplant complications . The utility of these in VCA and cutaneous evaluation, however, may be more tenuous.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of The 2007 Banff Vca Working Clasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, Doppler imaging of the mitral annulus can be a sensitive, but not specific technique for detecting severe heart transplant rejection . Newer MRI technologies that allow for diffusion weighted imaging can noninvasively evaluate tissue viability and acute kidney transplant rejection and postpancreatic transplant complications . The utility of these in VCA and cutaneous evaluation, however, may be more tenuous.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of The 2007 Banff Vca Working Clasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autologous grafts are considered as the gold standard, but they often include donor site morbidity where healthy tissue is removed from one site of the body to replace injured or missing tissue [ 17 ] and have limitations depending on the graft area size. Allogeneic grafts eliminate the donor site morbidity but may induce an immune response in the recipient [ 18 ], rejection with subsequent necrosis [ 19 ], and allograft removal or replacement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%