1999
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.99.14613769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value of FDG-PET in detecting residual or recurrent nonsmall cell lung cancer

Abstract: In order to evaluate the usefulness of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in the assessment of therapeutic effects, a study was performed before and after therapy in 126 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) codified stage I to stage IIIB.Treatment with an early curative result was given in 58 patients, whereas in 68 cases it was limited to palliation. During the treatment follow-up period (8±40 months), each patient was evaluated every 3 months by clinical examination an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
57
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
57
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…FDG-PET also offers improved sensitivity over CT imaging for differentiating new pulmonary nodules from scar tissue arising after surgical resection, radiation, and chemotherapy. For example, compared with CT, FDG-PET was 100% versus 71% sensitive and 92% versus 95% specific, respectively, in 126 NSCLC patients assessed before and after therapy (68). In a separate study of 63 NSCLC patients with suspected relapse, FDG-PET was 98% sensitive and had a negative predictive value of 93%; FDG-PET results stimulated a change in management of 40 (63%) patients (69).…”
Section: Fdg-pet Validated For Staging and Diagnosis: A Biomarker Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FDG-PET also offers improved sensitivity over CT imaging for differentiating new pulmonary nodules from scar tissue arising after surgical resection, radiation, and chemotherapy. For example, compared with CT, FDG-PET was 100% versus 71% sensitive and 92% versus 95% specific, respectively, in 126 NSCLC patients assessed before and after therapy (68). In a separate study of 63 NSCLC patients with suspected relapse, FDG-PET was 98% sensitive and had a negative predictive value of 93%; FDG-PET results stimulated a change in management of 40 (63%) patients (69).…”
Section: Fdg-pet Validated For Staging and Diagnosis: A Biomarker Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PET is more accurate than conventional studies in detecting recurrent lung cancer and appears to be superior in distinguishing persistent or recurrent tumour from fibrotic scars [59,71]. However, false-positive studies do occur secondary to postirradiation inflammatory change and delaying the examination until 4 or 5 weeks postirradiation is recommended [72].…”
Section: Positron Emission Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, conventional CT alone has been shown to be suboptimal in mediastinal restaging after treatment 8485 . 18 F-FDG PET has sensitivity of 93% to 100% and a specificity of 89% to 92% for detecting recurrent NSCLC 86–88. Patients with residual 18 F-FDG uptake after treatment have a poor prognosis when compared to those without residual 18 F-FDG uptake, taking into consideration the expected post-therapeutic inflammatory changes to avoid false-positive interpretation 84…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%