2021
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.668030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value of Dual-Energy Dual-Layer CT After Mechanical Recanalization for the Quantification of Ischemic Brain Edema

Abstract: Background and Purpose: Ischemic brain edema can be measured in computed tomography (CT) using quantitative net water uptake (NWU), a recently established imaging biomarker. NWU determined in follow-up CT after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has shown to be a strong predictor of functional outcome. However, disruption of the blood–brain barrier after MT may also lead to contrast staining, increasing the density on CT scans, and hence, directly impairing measurements of NWU. The purpose of this study was to deter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26,2931 Blood–brain barrier disruption occurs through endothelial injury and basement membrane degradation mediated through ischemia-related inflammation, iatrogenic toxicity and reperfusion injury, impairment of microcirculation by tissue edema, and direct mechanical vessel injury via procedural instrument manipulation during EVT. 2,3,26,28,32,33 Concordantly, we found larger infarct volumes to be independently associated with contrast leakage, in keeping with more severe ischemic injury leading to greater area of infarct and more intense intralesional injury with blood-brain-barrier disruption. 34…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…26,2931 Blood–brain barrier disruption occurs through endothelial injury and basement membrane degradation mediated through ischemia-related inflammation, iatrogenic toxicity and reperfusion injury, impairment of microcirculation by tissue edema, and direct mechanical vessel injury via procedural instrument manipulation during EVT. 2,3,26,28,32,33 Concordantly, we found larger infarct volumes to be independently associated with contrast leakage, in keeping with more severe ischemic injury leading to greater area of infarct and more intense intralesional injury with blood-brain-barrier disruption. 34…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Our findings contrast with the results of a recent small pilot retrospective single center study of 10 patients with follow-up conventional CT and DECT after middle cerebral artery territory infarcts. 3 However, this study applied statistical analyses designed for larger normally distributed sample size and therefore may have been underpowered as it did not detect a statistically significant difference despite 2 of 10 patients demonstrating more than 20% differences in NWU values between conventional CT and DECT. Furthermore, the timing of the DECT, which will directly influence contrast retained and eliminated, was not specified in this study, which limits direct comparison with our findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Postthrombectomy hyperdensity from hemorrhagic transformations and contrast staining occur in up to 84% of follow-up CT. 18 Even in the absence of obvious hyperdensity, visually inapparent iodine contrast staining after thrombectomy has been shown to substantially alter NWU measurements. 19 Although NWU has not been validated in the postreperfusion setting to account for these phenomena, this metric has been increasingly applied to post-thrombectomy follow-up CT without accounting for patients with postthrombectomy hemorrhage or contrast staining. [14][15][16] We aimed to investigate the accuracy of NWU on follow-up CT after treatment with or without hemorrhagic transformation and the use of thrombectomy by examining its correlation with conventional volumetric-orientated measures of cerebral edema.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-contrast computed tomography is a routine examination after thrombectomy, and brain parenchymal hyperdensity is a common imaging manifestation. The incidence of brain parenchymal hyperdensity after thrombectomy has been reported to vary from 60.8 to 84.2%, which is related to whether the artery is successfully recanalized as well as the time of CT examinations ( 17 , 19 , 29 , 30 ). In this study, we restricted our research objects to successful recanalization, and NCCT was completed immediately (within 1 h) after thrombectomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%