2005
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i31.4843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value of CT-guided core-needle biopsy in diagnosis and classification of malignant lymphomas using automated biopsy gun

Abstract: AIM:To evaluate the value of CT-guided core-needle biopsy in diagnosis and classification of malignant lymphomas.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
19
2
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
6
19
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note that the lack of precise subtyping/grading in a minority of cases did not preclude a therapeutic decision to be made for 62/63 patients (98%) with lymphoma. These rates not only compare favourably with those obtained in more homogeneous patient populations (de Kerviler et al, 2000(de Kerviler et al, , 2007Demharter et al, 2001;Screaton et al, 2002;Balestreri et al, 2005;Li et al, 2005;Sklair-Levy et al, 2005;de Larrinoa et al, 2007;Lachar et al, 2007) but also with results usually obtained by complete lymph node analysis. On the other hand, the diagnostic yield of CNB for diagnosis of benignity was only 53%, confirming that a definitive diagnosis for a benign disorder is a difficult task.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is important to note that the lack of precise subtyping/grading in a minority of cases did not preclude a therapeutic decision to be made for 62/63 patients (98%) with lymphoma. These rates not only compare favourably with those obtained in more homogeneous patient populations (de Kerviler et al, 2000(de Kerviler et al, , 2007Demharter et al, 2001;Screaton et al, 2002;Balestreri et al, 2005;Li et al, 2005;Sklair-Levy et al, 2005;de Larrinoa et al, 2007;Lachar et al, 2007) but also with results usually obtained by complete lymph node analysis. On the other hand, the diagnostic yield of CNB for diagnosis of benignity was only 53%, confirming that a definitive diagnosis for a benign disorder is a difficult task.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…However, the validity of CNB for lymphoma diagnosis is still controversial, and entire lymph node removal is often proposed as the best procedure Engert and Dreyling, 2008;Tilly and Dreyling, 2008). Moreover, most of the studies (de Kerviler et al, 2000;Demharter et al, 2001;Screaton et al, 2002;Balestreri et al, 2005;Li et al, 2005;Sklair-Levy et al, 2005;de Kerviler et al, 2007;de Larrinoa et al, 2007;Lachar et al, 2007) include patients with a high probability of lymphoma diagnosis assessed in reference centres for lymphoproliferative diseases. This study was designed to determine whether CNB can also be recommended in the context of a primary care hospital where a large range of malignant and benign diagnoses can be expected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This disposable, coaxial cutting needle has 16 gauge outer cannula and inner, notched rod in which a tissue specimen is cut, trapped, and withdrawn. The needle is commonly used for percutaneous biopsy of lymph nodes [5], liver [6], kidney [7], etc. One to two passes were made to obtain adequate amount of samples.…”
Section: Thoracoscopic Cutting Needle Biopsymentioning
confidence: 99%