2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrnm.2012.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value of contrast enhanced spoiled gradient (SPGR) MR and MIP MR imaging in diagnosis of peri-anal fistula

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their results showed a diagnostic accuracy of 99.4% for post contrast fat suppressed T1 TSE. Our results were also comparable to the results of Mazroa et al (32) and Daabis et al (33) , they found the diagnostic accuracy of post contrast sequence in the detection of perianal fistula to be 97.3% and 95% respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Their results showed a diagnostic accuracy of 99.4% for post contrast fat suppressed T1 TSE. Our results were also comparable to the results of Mazroa et al (32) and Daabis et al (33) , they found the diagnostic accuracy of post contrast sequence in the detection of perianal fistula to be 97.3% and 95% respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is predominantly preferred for diagnosing the anal region fistula, anovaginal, and rectovaginal fistula's anatomy [3]. CT usually fails to visualize inflammatory disease and also perianal abscess as it lacks soft-tissue resolution [7,8] and also fails in correct perianal fistula's classification as it fails to show the tract near the sphincter ani externus muscle and levator muscle, which results from the similar attenuation values [21,22]. On MRI and EUS, the abscess that contains air may be difficult to interpret from bowel air, but CT is free from this limitation [14].…”
Section: St James University Hospital's Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 tesla (T) MRI scanner), which gives better signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), increased spatial resolution that improves the lesion's visibility, increased temporal resolution, and reduced scan time [7]. Another crucial drawback of pulse sequence provides higher resolution images with fair visibility of lateral ramifications and fistula extensions [21]. To rule out the position of the set on after surgery, T1 weighted gradient echo imaging sequence was used [20].…”
Section: Pulse Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%