1992
DOI: 10.1159/000474790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value of Biochemical Markers in the Management of Disseminated Prostatic Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our result on time to PSA progression compares with findings on TTP previously reported, because it is estimated to take 6 to 12 months from PSA progression to the occurrence of radiologically detectable new lesions [28,29]. Our result on OS may be rather superior to previous reports [17,18] and the reason for that may be that 49% of the patients received docetaxel after failure to ADT in our study whereas few patients were treated with docetaxel in the past studies, though docetaxel treatment did not have a significant impact on OS in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Our result on time to PSA progression compares with findings on TTP previously reported, because it is estimated to take 6 to 12 months from PSA progression to the occurrence of radiologically detectable new lesions [28,29]. Our result on OS may be rather superior to previous reports [17,18] and the reason for that may be that 49% of the patients received docetaxel after failure to ADT in our study whereas few patients were treated with docetaxel in the past studies, though docetaxel treatment did not have a significant impact on OS in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Furthermore, in patients with PD the elevation in the serum concentration of all markers evaluated in the present study con firms the notion that not only bone resorption but also bone formation is increased during the development of skeletal metastases. This can be demonstrated by the presence of mixed (osteolytic and osteoblastic) metastases, or by the attempt to maintain the 'coupling' of bone formation and resorption [13][14][15]. Our study seems to confirm the latter hypothesis since we did not find any difference in the basal val ues of the markers (except BGP) when the patients were divided according to the type of metastases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Binding free energy (DG) and binding constants (K i ) were calculated and estimated within the AutoDock scoring function (Fig. 2) It is well known that the prostatic secretory protein PAP is often elevated in the sera of patients with prostate cancer (11)(12)(13)(14)(15). To determine the concentration of PAP required to hydrolyze 125 IQ 2-P to 125 IQ 2-OH , the SnQ 2-P -SnQ 2-P(I) mixture was incubated for z24 h in DMSO before its radioiodination, as this procedure has been shown to lead to the quantitative conversion of SnQ 2-P(I) to SnQ 2-P and the production of In vitro hydrolysis of 127 IQ 2-P / 125 IQ 2-P by human prostate tumor cells and normal mammalian cells assessed by fluorescence microscopy and autoradiography.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hydrolase was selected because it is a phosphatase that is expressed and secreted exclusively by the prostate and overexpressed and abundantly secreted by prostate cancer cells (8)(9)(10). Consequently, serum levels of PAP are frequently elevated in patients and are used as a marker for the disease (11)(12)(13)(14)(15). Although PAP has never fully achieved the status of an indispensable frontline test among urologists, lymph node metastases and/or extensions (consequent to a breach of the prostate capsule) are invariably accompanied by a rise in serum PAP (15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%