2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value Management: Private Sector's Perception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is not merely for green projects. For government projects, value management is mandatory for public projects exceeding RM50 million which is subject to the authorisation of Value Management (VM) Circular 3/2009 by the Economic Planning Unit (EPU) (Maznan et al, 2012). Therefore, value management cost is not only for green projects.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not merely for green projects. For government projects, value management is mandatory for public projects exceeding RM50 million which is subject to the authorisation of Value Management (VM) Circular 3/2009 by the Economic Planning Unit (EPU) (Maznan et al, 2012). Therefore, value management cost is not only for green projects.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applications of VM in the construction industry received major consideration in the early part of the twenty-first century, which followed an earlier trend in other industries such as automation. There are many publications related to VM in the construction industry, which also highlights the importance of its implementation in the construction sector (Maznan et al , 2012; Ismail et al , 2010; Thiry, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Malaysia, VM is perceived as a cost-cutting tool that can improve the scope and characteristics of a project. According to Maznan et al (2012), VM can extend the duration of a project, thereby yielding a very poor utilization of VM in construction projects and an underestimation of its benefits. The Singaporean construction industry reported that VM can improve communication among team members and their understanding of project objectives (Hwang et al , 2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature on VM in developing countries has revealed a scarcity of studies on VM including many false perceptions held by practitioners characterized by a lack of understanding of VM, a lack of awareness, misconceptions, the belief that VM can increase the duration of the project, a misunderstanding of its benefits, the common belief that VM is a cost-reduction tool and a lack of governmental support (Kim et al , 2016; Maznan et al , 2012; Othman et al , 2021; Tanko et al , 2018). In response to these challenges, recent research has focused on the application of VM in the construction industry; to this end, it has investigated critical success factors (CSFs) of VM applications (Hwang et al , 2015; Tanko et al , 2018), case studies on potential savings and building components (Asif et al , 2005; Kelly and Male, 2003), barriers to the successful adoption of VM (Aghimien et al , 2018; Othman et al , 2021) and perceptions of VM (Maznan et al , 2012; Wandahl, 2015). Although these studies investigated how to promote VM in construction through CSFs, barriers and perceptions, the connection between perceptions and CSFs is yet to be studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%