2011
DOI: 10.1080/08935696.2011.583007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value, Cooperatives, and Class Justice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, 'material success is a necessary but insufficient condition of life-sustaining value in economic geographies, since it is values … that inform social activity shape [in multiple ways] the particular forms and evaluations of 'life-sustaining' value' (Lee, 2006: 415). Furthermore, Kristjanson-Gural (2011), also when discussing the issue of distribution, reads DeMartino's ( 2003) notion of 'class justice' that consists of three over-lapping components -productive, appropriative and distributive justice. Kristjanson-Gural goes on to claim that, in order to achieve distributive justice, cooperatives have to enact regulations at three levels; at the level of the firm, the cooperative association, and the economy.…”
Section: The Mondragon Cooperative Corporationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, 'material success is a necessary but insufficient condition of life-sustaining value in economic geographies, since it is values … that inform social activity shape [in multiple ways] the particular forms and evaluations of 'life-sustaining' value' (Lee, 2006: 415). Furthermore, Kristjanson-Gural (2011), also when discussing the issue of distribution, reads DeMartino's ( 2003) notion of 'class justice' that consists of three over-lapping components -productive, appropriative and distributive justice. Kristjanson-Gural goes on to claim that, in order to achieve distributive justice, cooperatives have to enact regulations at three levels; at the level of the firm, the cooperative association, and the economy.…”
Section: The Mondragon Cooperative Corporationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Mechanisms of consent are crucial: the inevitable predistributions of surplus entailed by any exchange-based pricing structure (whether administrative or competitive in some form) need not be exploitative if the ''rules'' for pricing and/or price competition emerge from systematic social dialog rather than the anarchy of profit-seeking behavior*particular market outcomes may or may not be ''just,'' but they are not exploitative if the process that leads to those outcomes is collectively constituted. 11 I would put the point differently from Kristjanson-Gural (2011), although perhaps in the same spirit: a pricing structure such that ''workers in capital-intensive co-operative enterprises'' do capture revenues representing surplus labor performed by ''workers in labor-intensive co-operatives'' is not exploitative if that pricing structure is the outcome of a collective process. When the ''associated producers'' (Marx's frequent term) decide collectively on the rules of the game, the game cannot be exploitative.…”
Section: Worker Cooperatives 347mentioning
confidence: 95%